
Home  Forums  Rules  Articles  The diyAudio Store  Gallery  Blogs  Register  Donations  FAQ  Calendar  Search  Today's Posts  Mark Forums Read  Search 
MultiWay Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers 

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving 

Thread Tools  Search this Thread 
22nd June 2006, 05:47 PM  #1 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006

Transfer Function
Hi All,
I'm new here. Looks like an interesting and well run place. I need help with equation (19) from Richard Small's article in the J.A.E.S, December 1972. It is the response function for a driver in a closedbox. G(s) = s^2 Tc^2 / s^2 Tc^2 + s Tc / Qtc + 1 The first term on the right s^2 Tc^2 is the numerator. Values are: fc (resonance) = 58.31 Hz f = 228 Hz Qtc = 0.793 Also could someone explain the modus operandi of the equation, and is one term negative? Thanks jclouse 
23rd June 2006, 01:10 AM  #2 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: USA, MN

Tc = 1/Fc
Search on 'transfer function' , 'frequency response' , 'magnitude' , 'phase' , etc.... on google and you should be set. or just go to www.diysubwoofers.org and see how to solve them, the math is all boiled down to its simplest form there.
__________________
Our species needs, and deserves, a citizenry with minds wide awake and a basic understanding of how the world works. Carl Sagan Armaments, universal debt, and planned obsolescencethose are the three pillars of Western prosperity. —Aldous Huxley 
23rd June 2006, 08:46 AM  #3 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Switzerland

This is a 2nd order Highpass transfer function and should be written as
G(s) = s^2 Tc^2 / (s^2 Tc^2 + s Tc / Qtc + 1) in order to be correct. It is not that difficult to imagine what happens: If s ( i.e. j* 2 * Pi * f) is approaching infinity then the function approaches 1. At the pole frequency the term s^2*Tc^2 becomes 1 and therefore the the function behaves as  1/ (s Tc / Qtc). Hence we have humps for high Q values and premature rolloff at low Q values. The closer the frequency moves to zero the more the function approaches the behaviour s^2 Tc^2 / 1 hence the 2nd order rolloff. Regards Charles 
27th June 2006, 08:14 PM  #4 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006

To Ron E and Phase Accurate
Thanks. For sinusoidal signals G(s) becomes G(jw), so that G(jw) = [(w/wo)^2]/[((w/wo)^2 1) + j[(w/wo)/Qt] jc 
27th June 2006, 11:22 PM  #5  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm

Quote:
G(jw) = [ (w/wo)^2]/[ 1  (w/wo)^2 + j[(w/wo)/Qt] 

28th June 2006, 07:04 PM  #6 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006

Svante wrote:
" G(jw) = [ (w/wo)^2]/[ 1  (w/wo)^2 + j[(w/wo)/Qt] " This gives a negative value in the passband, and being a highpass function, should not be below unity. Note although 1  w/wo is negative, when squared it becomes positive. IMO the following is OK (converting to w/wo=r for simpler presentation). G(jw)=r^2/[(1r^2)+j(r/Qt)] With the values cited (f=228 Hz, fo=58.31 Hz, Qt=0.793) this gives magnitude of G(jw) = 3.91^2/[13.91^2)+j(3.91/0.793)]=1.0115 jc 
28th June 2006, 07:55 PM  #7  
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm

Quote:
G(jw) = [  ((w/wo)^2)]/[ 1  ((w/wo)^2) + j[(w/wo)/Qt] " The minus signs comes from squaring j. 

28th June 2006, 08:41 PM  #8 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006

Svanre wrote:
"Ok, to clarify what I meant: G(jw) = [  ((w/wo)^2)]/[ 1  ((w/wo)^2) + j[(w/wo)/Qt] " The minus signs comes from squaring j. " Squaring the ratio of two frequencies should not make the result negative. jc 
28th June 2006, 10:12 PM  #9 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Stockholm

Ok, let's go back to the original equation:
G(s) = s^2 Tc^2 / (s^2 Tc^2 + s Tc / Qtc + 1) which should be the same as G(jw) = (jw/w0)^2 / [ (jw/w0)^2 + (jw/w0) / Qt + 1] which becomes G(jw) =  ((w/w0)^2) / [  ((w/w0)^2) + (jw/w0) / Qt + 1] which can be rearranged to G(jw) = [  ((w/wo)^2)]/[ 1  ((w/wo)^2) + j[(w/wo)/Qt] Right? 
28th June 2006, 11:01 PM  #10 
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2006

" Ok, let's go back to the original equation:
G(s) = s^2 Tc^2 / (s^2 Tc^2 + s Tc / Qtc + 1) which should be the same as G(jw) = (jw/w0)^2 / [ (jw/w0)^2 + (jw/w0) / Qt + 1] which becomes G(jw) =  ((w/w0)^2) / [  ((w/w0)^2) + (jw/w0) / Qt + 1] which can be rearranged to G(jw) = [  ((w/wo)^2)]/[ 1  ((w/wo)^2) + j[(w/wo)/Qt] Right? " Unsure. Polarity was my concern at the beginning. You stated: "The minus signs comes from squaring" and my reply was not addressed per se, i.e. "Squaring the ratio of two frequencies should not make the result negative." Also the equation: G(jw)=r^2/(1r^2)+j(r/Qt) from physics books does not show r in the numerator as negative. This contradicts the numerator being negative. Note the last term may be written as j(2dr), where damping d=1/2Qt, jc 
Thread Tools  Search this Thread 


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
transfer function  jenks  Solid State  31  24th April 2008 09:28 PM 
Sound card transfer function  NIC1138  Digital Source  9  15th July 2007 01:15 AM 
Estimating amplifier transfer function...?  Limhes  Solid State  3  26th April 2007 06:17 AM 
Transfer function of closed box  cm961  MultiWay  1  31st August 2004 07:42 PM 
Electrical transfer function measurement  Thomas B  MultiWay  4  12th March 2003 05:04 AM 
New To Site?  Need Help? 