"The phase coherence of harmonics in the vocal formant range, ~630Hz to 4000Hz" - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Loudspeakers > Multi-Way

Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th November 2012, 09:17 PM   #1
Elias is offline Elias  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Elias's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
Default "The phase coherence of harmonics in the vocal formant range, ~630Hz to 4000Hz"

The thread title is one of the key points from David Griesinger's presentation:
"Pitch, Timbre, Source Separation"
http://www.davidgriesinger.com/Acous...b_sound_3.pptx


Looks like he has come to a conclusion many fundamental auditory perceptions are derived from the property:
"the phase coherence of harmonics in the vocal formant range, ~630Hz to 4000Hz"



Now, this can have some interesting consequencies to the sound reproduction over loudspeakers in a small room, too.

In order to achieve the above requirement we would need at least:

* phase linear loudspeaker over this freq range

* No cross over within this freq range

* No cabinet difractions within this freq range

* No early room reflections in this freq range

* Modulation transfer function of unity in this freq range



It's all nice, BUT, what will happen to the harmonic phase coherence when you put 2 loudspeakers in a triangle and get terrible stereophonic comb filtering at the listening position ?

There should be at least one possible solution to reproduce sound over loudspeakers while the above requirements remain achievable: Cross talk cancelling



- Elias
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets

Last edited by Elias; 16th November 2012 at 09:19 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2012, 09:30 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
The properties of stereo phantom image formation remains highly intact for speaker pairs that mash up phase in similar fashion.

When signal content in one speaker undergoes different mashing, such as with driver break up modes, or poorly behaved passive crossover, phantom image is degraded.

Asymmetrical lateral early reflections distort imaging. And identity of source as some manner of speaker due to speaker transfer function is nothing new.

Take home message of David Griesinger is that virtually all sources with low frequency components have harmonic content which is faster for brain to decode into locational cues.

Regards,

Andrew
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2012, 10:21 PM   #3
Rudolf is offline Rudolf  Germany
diyAudio Member
 
Rudolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Germany
Elias,
as I understand Griesinger, the phase coherence is not a value in itself, but is helping the brain to decipher the individual(s) formants in each critical band filter. I'm referring to foil 28 here. So the phase coherence must be sufficient in each critical band (and some region left and right of it perhaps), but not linear for the complete vocal formant range.
Room reflections certainly are an issue. Cabinet diffractions can be an issue if not dealt with in the way I do .

Rudolf
__________________
www.dipolplus.de
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2012, 10:25 PM   #4
jcx is offline jcx  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
yes matching phase response is all that is required to maintain "phase coherence" between channels

but it is reported to be possible to train to decern large mid frequency crossover phase shift - but as far as I know independent of "imaging"
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2012, 11:08 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
mondogenerator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: City Of Villans
Blog Entries: 1
Elias: I think that most of your ideals could be achieved.

#1: agree, but isnt that impossible?
#2: agree. Quite possible.
#3: again I agree, and its quite possible to achieve.
#4: the band of freqencies you quote would suit judicious room treatment.
#5: i use transfer functions but never the modal variety Would getting #2, 3 and 4 be close enough to achieving #5?
__________________
Every new piece of knowledge pushes something else out of my brain - Homer.....................Simpson

Last edited by mondogenerator; 16th November 2012 at 11:19 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2012, 11:39 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
#1 has already been achieved:

Click the image to open in full size.

#2 is not a requirement;

#3 is effectively achieved by speaker system to demonstrate #1

#4 follows from #3 and good speaker placement

#5 for described speaker is exceptional

DSP based Pluto Clone has amazing imaging.

Regards

Andrew
  Reply With Quote
Old 16th November 2012, 11:52 PM   #7
dewardh is offline dewardh  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Berkeley, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barleywater View Post
DSP based Pluto Clone has amazing imaging.
Even "analog" PLUTO is none to shabby in that regard . . .

It's not even a new argument . . . "300-3000" has been described as a "critical range" for a long time. 700-4000 should be easier to achieve with a single driver . . (hmmm . . . PLUTO almost does . . .)
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2012, 08:54 AM   #8
Elias is offline Elias  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Elias's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolf View Post
Elias,
as I understand Griesinger, the phase coherence is not a value in itself, but is helping the brain to decipher the individual(s) formants in each critical band filter. I'm referring to foil 28 here. So the phase coherence must be sufficient in each critical band (and some region left and right of it perhaps), but not linear for the complete vocal formant range.
Interesting argument, but as single critical bandwidth does not yet fully determine the timbe nor pitch the comparison is made through the full freq range. And, taking into account the critical bandwidth is not a discrete value consept but a smooth continous filtering phenomena then it follows that as phase linearity is required within one band it is required along the whole freq band.

As noted in other posts linear phase is approachable with engineering.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Rudolf View Post
Room reflections certainly are an issue. Cabinet diffractions can be an issue if not dealt with in the way I do .

Rudolf
Also maybe a big non diffracting horn like JMLC would do.


- Elias
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2012, 08:56 AM   #9
Elias is offline Elias  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Elias's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcx View Post
yes matching phase response is all that is required to maintain "phase coherence" between channels

but it is reported to be possible to train to decern large mid frequency crossover phase shift - but as far as I know independent of "imaging"
The issue was not a coherence difference but the absolute value.
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets
  Reply With Quote
Old 17th November 2012, 08:58 AM   #10
Elias is offline Elias  Finland
diyAudio Member
 
Elias's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Where you live
Quote:
Originally Posted by mondogenerator View Post
Would getting #2, 3 and 4 be close enough to achieving #5?
Could be enough. The MTF could serve as a metric.
__________________
Liberate yourself from the illusion of two speaker stereo triangle
Dipole Bass vs Monopole Bass Stereophonic Sound from a Single Loudspeaker 3 Speaker Linear Stereo Matrix Wavelets
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best "Vintage" Stereo Pres that SoftClip and lotsa Harmonics billzoe Tubes / Valves 12 30th April 2012 08:39 PM
Delivery Source for the 10cm "HR Vocal Driver" from "4722" LENS (47-lab) wanted tiefbassuebertr Full Range 0 24th April 2012 11:14 PM
Harmonics above 20Khz - "Hi-Fi" and the limits of human hearing percy Everything Else 62 12th March 2008 05:27 PM
which common large FR offer good vocal "reproduction"? freddi Full Range 0 23rd July 2007 12:36 AM
tangband 3" full range w/ wood phase plug? audiotang Full Range 31 5th May 2005 03:40 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 12:39 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2