|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Multi-Way Conventional loudspeakers with crossovers |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Brisbane
|
I've just finished routing my baffles (2x18mm) for my ZRT 2.5 way sealed.
Should I do a 45" chamfer around the the woofer, or can I just use the same 1/2" rounding bit as i'll use on my baffle edges?
__________________
-Tor Last edited by iampivot; 15th April 2012 at 07:03 AM. Reason: spelling |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
I would suggest a big champher is necessary if you want to avoid cavity resonance from screwing up your mids.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Md
|
Round vs. camber. Two issues, you pick. Camber will have a sharp edge that is libel to produce refraction. Round over a bit more restrictive so if you expect really large cone excursions, maybe an issue.
I camber, then hit it with a flapper disk and smooth everything out trying for a horn-like profile. |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta
|
It's CHAMFER not camber, champher, or camfer!
__________________
Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines. Enzo Ferrari |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
Champher & camber are both correct, chamfer would be an americanization of champher.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
Once you chamfer the chamber you can clamber for some champagne, champ.
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: sydney
|
With the baffles, is there any minuses using 2x18mm mdf, instead of one piece 36mm?
I know it's hard to find large thickness mdf, the thickest I can find locally is 32mm. But the suppliers can glue two thickness's together for me. ps I did chamfer a 45 deg camber for woofer in a 25mm baffle
__________________
Indecision makes the world gone round. Maybe |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
frugal-phile(tm)
diyAudio Moderator
|
2 layers of 18mm MDF are likely better than 1 x 36. 3x 12 would be better yet. 2 x 12mm of quality plywood even better.
dave
__________________
community sites t-linespeakers.org, frugal-horn.com, frugal-phile.com ........ commercial site planet10-HiFi p10-hifi forum here at diyA |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
YES!
Troels gravesen did a big write up on the matter. I can't find it right now though |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Zaph, 36mm Forstner Bit... | critofur | Multi-Way | 3 | 13th March 2011 08:29 PM |
| Binding posts for 36mm thick panel? | wixy | Multi-Way | 5 | 11th August 2007 07:25 AM |
| WTB: FELT F13 Grey - 1/4" to 3/4" Thick - Like on Duntech/Dunlavy Speakers' Baffle | dtm1962 | Swap Meet | 0 | 21st October 2006 04:18 AM |
| attn: shinobiwan & tony gee & others with thick front baffle cuts | sqlkev | Multi-Way | 14 | 24th March 2006 08:22 AM |
| 2" baffle to thick? | basham | Subwoofers | 1 | 11th December 2005 07:52 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |