No, it's not. The article is complete nonsense, top to bottom. No-one is going to bother to "confirm or decipher or dislocate" a badly written article by someone entirely ignorant of basic physics appearing on a crackpot website.
Something is chasing you, the faster you run the slower you go...
Interesting that speed effects time...
Regards
M. Gregg
Time warp; travelling at the speed of light anywhere in space.
True, it's just an article on the Internet.
True, it has as much sense as one is going to give it.
True, those are my own words (confirm, decipher, dislocate).
True, the article was written by someone totally in the unknown of reality.
And true, not only he but all of us, are as intelligent as our level of expertise in the physic sciences. ...And much much more.
We don't have to wait for the future, we are already living in it; just look at where we are now!
I've always known there was something fundamentally wrong....
You know there is something wrong with the world...you don't know what it is...like a splinter in your mind...driving you mad..
Follow the white rabbit...
Regards
M. Gregg
Last edited:
I think quite a few at Princeton University say that never happened though.
The dark energy will collapse, if it's anti-matter. Imho.
7000 years BCE the entire population of England was around 1000 people. They all got their share.
If every single country in the world had a ceiling limit of 200 million people and two children into infinity, that should be totally satisfactory.
I won't discuss these statistics after this post, since this forum does not allow political.
There are books discussing these issues, including our mostly lost primordial forest http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bia%C5%82owie%C5%BCa_Forest
Here is one called "countdown" http://articles.latimes.com/2013/sep/20/entertainment/la-ca-jc-alan-weisman-countdown-20130922
Last edited:
Speed of Light!
I'm not so sure; I don't know why exactly but I believe in different metaphysical compositions of particles somewhere far in unknown space that might slow down the speed of light as we know it. Best would be having the capability to go there.
I'm not so sure; I don't know why exactly but I believe in different metaphysical compositions of particles somewhere far in unknown space that might slow down the speed of light as we know it. Best would be having the capability to go there.
Last edited:
I'm pretty sure light goes everywhere.
If our universe is isotropic then light most likely should have crossed the entire universe already and came back on the other side, unless the 'edges' of the expansion were moving too fast for the light to catch up.
So far, attempts to detect this multi-card entry of light into the universe have failed, but relax, they are looking for it......
"then light has had time to circumnavigate it since the big bang, producing multiple images of distant points in the CMBR, which would show up as patterns of repeating circles.[29] Cornish et al. looked for such an effect at scales of up to 24 gigaparsecs (78 Gly or 7.4×1026 m) and failed to find it"
From Observable universe - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
But does the universe also include impenetrable dark dimensions where light is not allowed to penetrate?
What is a black hole? Does it have an entrance and an exit? ...And when inside is there another universe within?
Anyone here who has ever been in one and back?
...All very very fascinating, including your link.
What is a black hole? Does it have an entrance and an exit? ...And when inside is there another universe within?
Anyone here who has ever been in one and back?
...All very very fascinating, including your link.
Last edited:
I imagine a star on the verge of becoming a black hole, would act quite similar to a black-hole which just crossed over from being a star.
I don't think there is very much to find inside stars.
Inside dark energy yes, since it includes dark galaxies and dark solar systems, with dark earths and dark vampires. It's like a goths wet dream.
I don't think there is very much to find inside stars.
Inside dark energy yes, since it includes dark galaxies and dark solar systems, with dark earths and dark vampires. It's like a goths wet dream.
Albert Einstein Wrong: Speed of Light Calculation May Be Incorrect
Normally I dont waste my time with this stuff. Looks like I should stick to my policy. This is utter drivel.
It takes c. 4 hours for the light of the sun to get to Pluto. Thank god we dont have a supernova 4 light hours from earth - we'd have been toast eons ago.
Normally I dont waste my time with this stuff. Looks like I should stick to my policy. This is utter drivel.
It takes c. 4 hours for the light of the sun to get to Pluto. Thank god we dont have a supernova 4 light hours from earth - we'd have been toast eons ago.
Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals:
Science Journals
"Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken, according to a Nobel prize winner who has declared a boycott on the publications."
http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Miscellaneous/Download/5547
Science in Turmoil - Are we Funding Fraud?
by Dr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies
Science in Turmoil - Are we Funding Fraud?
Science Journals
"Leading academic journals are distorting the scientific process and represent a "tyranny" that must be broken, according to a Nobel prize winner who has declared a boycott on the publications."
http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals/Communications-Miscellaneous/Download/5547
Science in Turmoil - Are we Funding Fraud?
by Dr. Jeremy Dunning-Davies
Science in Turmoil - Are we Funding Fraud?
The speed of light is always relative to the observer. Measurements indicate that the speed of light is definitely influenced by the density of gravity (distant observer). It is slowed down... But for an observer within that dense gravity field, light passes at lightspeed.
This is one of the problems with Einstein... he never took the effort of properly defining were the "observer" was. That lack of accuracy is confusing.
Tip: read Rob Roodenburg's Repairing Relativity... You don't have to agree to his theory, but at least he took the effort of properly defining his "observers".
- Status
- Not open for further replies.