Yes, I know what the BB theory states.. I only do not agree. Even the heaviest Black Holes do not come close to the indefinite density the BB theory assumes. Even adding multiples of the mass of those Black Holes can't establish such a density. Besides there are indications that Black Holes do not have a globe shape ... So a singularity would be impossible.
I guess that might depend on the conditions of that variance in C... If eg. C slows down under influence of heavy gravity (denser time-space), the same rules still apply. I do not know if C varies under other conditions... input please?
You misunderstand me if you thought I was implying Einstein is wrong, quite the opposite.
This is absolutely correct, and in my experience, scientists (and I mean *real* scientists, not "political scientists" or "social scientists" or the like) are extremely aware of it.
In the case of constancy of c, it's not just direct measurements (which we do to insanely good precision and accuracy, and I mean to trillionths), it's all of the measurements of other phenomena which depend on the constancy of c which give us certainty about this as an established fact. Any hypothesis about changes in c have to also explain the massive amount of experimental support from both direct measurements and measurements of other phenomena which depend on that constancy. As you might expect, just as with the Three Laws of Thermodynamics, this is a high barrier to overcome, which is why those hypotheses are generally considered (at best) to be on the fringes.
I don't think you can take a single black hole as observed in the current universe and equate it to the mass of 30 x 10^22 stars.
Clearly, they do vary in size, and if our universe emerged from 'the other side' of a black hole, as some have postulated, it must have been quite immense.
However, the latest are that our universe will not collapse in on itself, but go on expanding in perpetuity.
Last edited:
See I thought there were 4 Laws of thermodynamics.
I myself would prefer that there were not so many divisions within science, some concepts of the zeroth law of thermodynamics support infinity, perhaps that it is why it is ignored in 2014 by some?
Where does Darwinism begin?, which leads to the definition of life, life is everywhere if you broaden your definition of what life is.
Life did not start after the Late Heavy Bombardment 4.1 billion years ago, merely the life we recognize today was influence by elements that mixed with existing elements at a opportunistic time and place.
What makes the hydrogen within us more "alive" then the hydrogen in the sun?
At what point does one group of elements get alienated from others becoming an "individual"?
Looser definitions would classify the sun as an animal, and what a beast it is.
Too bad Darwin and Einstein did not have the opportunity to cross paths.
Darwin could explain the existence of Einstein, I wonder if Einstein could explain the origin of Darwin....to be a fly on that wall.
All the results of relativity flow from the postulate of the constancy of the speed of light, have been well proven, and are used in GPS, for example.
The length of a meter is now defined as the distance light travels in a vacuum in
1/(299 792 458) second.
soz to have woken u from ur slumber... ;-)
all the posts are relevant to the original question ? YES !
Please enlighten me to the real truth if u wud be so kind... the only entity in the universe that knows the answer is now going to impart the truth on us all.. go ahead ;-) KEEP ON READING EVERYONE'S POSTS
Me too I immensely enjoy the discussion; this is truly a most fascinating subject.
<<>> Albert Einstein Wrong: Speed of Light Calculation May Be Incorrect
Of course it is; it was wrong right from the get-go!
Big time!
It's coming to an end...
...
From that link keep reading, the comments. ...For a wider, 'expanding universe' perspective.
What is the law of relativity?
...A man-made (physicist) theory based on his extremely limited knowledge on all things expanded universe?
I'm trying to find anything in that article which is correct. So far, I have failed.
Even that mass doesn't come close to the requirements for a singularity.... it is not going to happen.
That's the point; it is in suspension right now at this time, till someone real smart can confirm or decipher or dislocate.
But me I believe that the speed of light is inconsistent (variable) in different pressure zones of space. ...Ticker particles of matter can slow down its speed.
Of course I've never been there, only experienced it in some of my dreams.
Something is chasing you, the faster you run the slower you go...
Interesting that speed effects time...
Regards
M. Gregg
- Status
- Not open for further replies.