|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Headphone Systems Everything to do with Headphones |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#61 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mayberry RFD, Alabama
|
Right on, I so agree with everything you said!
|
|
|
|
#62 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest
|
Quote:
There are also plenty of studies that have shown even 0.1% can be audible. It depends on the source, type of distortion, duration of the distortion, listener, volume, etc. But tests have shown the 3rd and higher order harmonics can be heard down to 0.05%. And, finally, there's the "cocktail party effect" that's also been proven in studies. Much like picking out someone's relatively quieter voice across a crowded room, the ear and brain do the same thing with distortion. The studies have shown we can hear distortion down to about 1/10th the masking distortion. So even if a speaker has 1% THD, if you add another 0.1% THD of a different kind of distortion, it can be audible.
__________________
http://nwavguy.com - Personal non-commercial audio blog |
|
|
|
|
#63 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mayberry RFD, Alabama
|
Tell where you get a Calibrated microphone that has <~0.1%.
Also, I would like to see the part number and THD vs frequency calibration chart! |
|
|
|
#64 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: ..
|
Search is broken in your browser?
basically just back off in SPL and microphone distortion reduces at least proportionately 0.1% @ 120 dB SPL is no probelm for a mic speced at 3% distortion @ 160+ dB http://www.acopacific.com/chart.html Last edited by jcx; 26th April 2011 at 11:39 PM. |
|
|
|
#65 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mayberry RFD, Alabama
|
Quote:
I can't agree with your statement....distortion isn't linear problem with respect to SPL...it's more about the electro-acoustics and the limitations incurred. Even LinearX and Earthworks do not specify a distortion in those area's. One can play games with numbers, but I doubt your Google can find a microphone with less than or equal to 0.01% THD across the audio range. Maybe your browser is more powerful than mine..... Additionally, those that state very low THD are likely at 1 KHz and not across the audio band. Lastly I'm not sure what the fencing is about with these numbers...what music do you listen too that has distortion that low???? Have you ever mixed in Pro recording studio?? Do you think the very source of the material passed from input to medium with those astronomical numbers? If your lucky a guitar amp is around 10% at the source. Most all studio microphones will not pass the 1% test....again, what are we fencing about here - numbers?
|
|
|
|
|
#66 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest
|
For the HD650 discussed here, the highest peak in the distortion spectrum at HeadRoom is at -93 dB. That's less than 0.003%!
http://graphs.headphone.com/graphCompare.php?graphType=1&graphID[]=853 A tube amp cranking out a typical 1% THD has overall distortion of -40 dB. That's a whopping 50+ dB louder grunge than the Sennheiser's produce by themselves. And if you think the above graph is somehow wrong, here's another test made on very different equipment that also shows the HD 650's distortion down near zero (2nd graph down): Sound Quality - Sennheiser HD 650 Headphones Review - Over-Ear Both of these were made with the microphones you claim cannot have low distortion. Distortion is distortion. If the sine wave is altered by ANYTHING in the signal path it shows up in the spectrum and a THD measurement. In this case both the mic and the headphones are essentially distortion free. Like I said earlier, it's a common MYTH but that doesn't make it fact. If you have evidence to the contrary, please present it?
__________________
http://nwavguy.com - Personal non-commercial audio blog Last edited by RocketScientist; 27th April 2011 at 12:16 AM. |
|
|
|
#67 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Mayberry RFD, Alabama
|
Phenomenalism!
I bet if when cryo-cooled the numbers actually go negative. like -0.0001%
|
|
|
|
#68 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Kuala Lumpur
|
Microphones rarely have to capture all of the instruments at once, so intermodulation is largely eliminated.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Maximum output with tda2050 | pra3718 | Chip Amps | 11 | 10th August 2009 04:42 PM |
| Driver Choice and Maximum Output | pjpoes | Multi-Way | 7 | 4th March 2009 02:02 PM |
| How do I calculate the maximum output of a driver? | The Paulinator | Subwoofers | 2 | 21st May 2008 01:00 PM |
| Maximum transformer output | RobPhill33 | Everything Else | 4 | 17th March 2003 12:50 AM |
| Allowable impedance of mosfet driver stage | Circlotron | Solid State | 2 | 30th August 2002 03:16 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |