Compact disc player sonic differences by various signal procesing devices before DAC - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Digital Source

Digital Source Digital Players and Recorders: CD , SACD , Tape, Memory Card, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 5th October 2009, 10:04 AM   #1
diyAudio Member
 
tiefbassuebertr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
Default Compact disc player sonic differences by various signal procesing devices before DAC

There are many informations and discuss about the sound of various digital to analogue converter units and jitter reduction methods. But I donít find informations about the sound influence of the various decoder technologies. At bottom I listed examples of good known chipsets (except that one of first generation), where as the first three I would prefer. What are your experiences regarded different sonic quality only concerning the part before DAC?

Philips (used in a wide range of high end cd player models)
1) M4804A/SAA7210 (PCM Dec) SAA7220P/B (PCM-Decoder)/ uPD41416C (dynamic RAM/FiFo) TDA 5708, TDA5709 (RF/Servo)
2) SAA7310 (PCM Dec) SAA7323 (Servo) TDA 8708, TDA8709 (RF/Servo)
3) SAA7324 (newest PCM Decoder from NXP, inside by VAM1254/CDpro2LF)

Sanyo (found in cheap but very good sounded NAD 5325)
LA9200NM (RF/Servo) LC7863A (PCM-Dec.), LC3517-B5-15 (S-RAM)

Hitachi:/Sony (found in Linn Karik)
CXD2500Q (CXD2500AQ, CXD2500BQ, PCM Decoder + DF) HA12158NT (HA12158, RF/Servo, Hitachi/Renesas)

Mitsubishi/Philips
M27256FI (PCM Dec) SAA7220P/B (PCM-Decoder)/ uPD41416C (dynamic RAM/FiFo)
TDA 5708, TDA5709 (RF/Servo)

Mitsubishi/Sony
M51564P (Optical Pickup Servo Control, SSOP-36) M50422P (PCM-decoder, QFP-80, 80P6-B, Mitsubishi), M5M4416P-15 (dynamic RAM/FiFo) CX20109, SO-24, RF, SONY),

Matsushita/Panasonic/Technics
8802SC56.4 (MN8802(?) RF-amp MN66271RA (Servo), Technics 8389S (= AN8389S, Servo-Driver+Output Stage) RJB 1123A /CU3C (PCM Dec)

SONY
1)CX20109 (20109, SO-24, RF), CX20108 (20108, SO-30, Servo), CX23035 (QFP) MP8416-20L (dynamic RAM/FiFo)
2) CXA1081S (RF) CXA1082BS (Servo) IC103: CXD1135Q/CXD1165Q/CXD1167Q (Dec, QFP 80-pol, formerly Version: CXD1125Q (PCM Decoder, QFP) with UM6116M-2L (dynamic RAM/FiFo)
3) CXD2500Q (Dec, QFP), SM5840DP (DF, NPC), CXA1471S (HF), CXA1372Q (Servo, QFP)
4) CXD2500AQ (PCM Dec), CXD2552Q (Servo), CXD1244 (DF) KSS240 include RF-Amp
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2009, 04:40 PM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Lima, Peru
You have completely ignored and forgotten the first generation philips TDA1540/TDA1541 players. Consequently, you will never reach audio nirvana...

[just joking ]
  Reply With Quote
Old 5th October 2009, 04:45 PM   #3
diyAudio Member
 
tiefbassuebertr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
both TDA 1540 and TDA 1541 are digital to analouge converter (DAC) !!! That should be not the topic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 21st October 2009, 07:54 PM   #4
diyAudio Member
 
Eric Juaneda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Avignon, France
Default Listening digital filter

Hi tiefbassuebertr,
Few years ago I wrote an article about listening digital filter. I have a player where you can choose different digital filter.
You can find on my web site: Listening digital filter

It's a very interesting discussion. Each digital filter has its own sonority.
I have at home during one year many DAC with various digital filters like SAA7220, Wadia or DAX with various algorithms. It's very interesting to listen to each of one.

Some "digital sound family" is often introduced by digital filter and not digital process.
__________________
Eric Juaneda - tech.Juaneda.com - Junilabs.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2011, 09:00 PM   #5
diyAudio Member
 
tiefbassuebertr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
Thank you for your advice to this website.
  Reply With Quote
Old 20th June 2011, 09:43 PM   #6
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
I agree with Flavio81
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2011, 11:34 AM   #7
diyAudio Member
 
tiefbassuebertr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewGM View Post
I agree with Flavio81
DAC IC's are not the subject of this discussion (is my english so bad ? Please read the headline carefully).
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2011, 02:16 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Virginia
Agree that the filter chip makes a difference. But don't forget the controller for the RAM buffer needed to eliminate the optical mechanism low-frequency jitter (there because of tracking imperfections).

Right now I am convinced of the utility of a DSP post processing. The cheap chips that do OS/digital filter don't seem to have enough processing power to do a proper interpolation, noise shaping dithering, upsampling, etc. FIR taps and bit depth are limited by the silicon proformance in the year that the filter was designed. Poor on SAA7220, better in SM5847, even better in DF1706... but always limited.
I have the Denon AL24 Processing Plus and beats clearly the other old timer SAA7220 or the other PCM DAC's without DSP processing (that I have too).
I did hear also the Anagram's ATF in a CA Azur 840C and CA DACMagic... they are better than any dedicated cip filter ever made.
Even the Harman Kardon HD990 sounds better than a "normal" player - but I didn't have enough time to listen it properly (just in demo store).
Some companies, recognizing the limits of integrated fiters, sell custom-made DSP filters as upgrades for their equipment.

DSP-based filters have also the advantage to separate the jitter domains using a bigger buffer memory. None of the integrated chips have that ability. This is maybe more important than the quality of filtering and upsampling.

PS: Of course this apply only to CD sources. On higher resolution DVD-A, the differences are diminishing to none.
PPS: Independent opinions, not identical with my findings, but conclusion is the same - dedicated DSP is the best solution.

Last edited by SoNic_real_one; 26th December 2011 at 02:39 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 26th December 2011, 05:03 PM   #9
adason is offline adason  United States
diyAudio Member
 
adason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Maryland
do not forget the JVC JCE4501
JVC legendary DD converter
  Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2011, 08:19 AM   #10
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brunei
I am curious what you guys think and know of the "S.T.A.R.S." system developed by Anagram Technologies (swiss) and used as preprocessing in Audio Aero players?
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
sonic differences between different operating systems ralf Digital Source 3 7th September 2007 01:07 PM
Converting CAL CL10 5 disc player to a single disc player stoolpigeon Digital Source 0 27th May 2007 01:25 PM
Compact 15" sub - BMS or Precision Devices? DIAR Subwoofers 7 4th January 2007 04:06 PM
Speakers From An Old Sony Compact Disc Deck Receiver borgs Multi-Way 1 14th November 2006 02:20 AM
Sonic differences - discrete vs. integrated? mlihl Pass Labs 15 16th September 2006 03:12 PM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 AM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright ©1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2