|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Digital Line Level DACs, Digital Crossovers, Equalizers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#191 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
SPDIF (Sony Philips Digital Interface) is a single signal that carries audio data and some metadata, with the clock embedded in the signal using biphase mark coding. This coding strategy allows extracting the clock and the data separately from the stream. On the other hand, I2S (Inter IC Sound) is a protocol for conveying audio data between chips. I don't think it was ever intended for use by the final user, but only for electronic engineers designing the board. It consists mostly in 3 signals: the data, the bit clock that's useful for sampling the latter data stream, and the Left/Right clock useful for deciding if the bits being sampled belong to the left of the right channel. On the SPDIF side, all the communication aspects have been normalized: the signal amplitude, the line impedance, and there's theoretically enough metadata in order to properly decode the data stream. On the other hand for I2S, it's all up to the designer. Voltage levels are not normalized (it can be 3.3V, 5V or whatever, TTL or CMOS). Then the receiver must know how the bits are aligned in the stream, how many clocks per frame (referred to fs clock) etc. This makes that if you plan to transfer audio with I2S, you must know exactly what the transmitter is able to spit out, then setup the receiver accordingly (and sometimes insert logic level translation between the receiver and the transmitter). Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
#192 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Ok, I got my questions answered
Will there be any pre-presentation of hard and software before the actual release ?
|
|
|
|
#193 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
This week I've set up the digital input and the sample rate converter. It's all going smoothly and the project is on track. One more feature I haven't mentioned so far: There's also onboard an isolated command for external relays intended for turning on and off your amps. |
|
|
|
|
#194 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ystad
|
To me this project looks very sane. I was considering a Behringer, but they seem not really suited for domestic use. One benefit of theirs is the possibillity to use a microphone for automatic response correction. On the other hand they are not DIY, which is half of the fun.
|
|
|
|
#195 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Lets say I'm going for the digital solution, analog + digital + I2s input / spdif out.
Is there still need for the +/-12v supply then ? Last edited by dahlberg; 22nd August 2012 at 03:28 PM. |
|
|
|
#196 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
About the 5v supply. How much current will be sufficient ?
|
|
|
|
#197 | |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
There's a separate 5VA (analogue). It's derived from the +12V supply. That's why you must always provide +/-12V. If you plan to use an analogue volume chip, CS3318 needs +/- 8 to 9V and CS3308 needs +/- 5V. These 2 supplies are again derived from +/-12V with onboard regulators. 1A is safe. Power lines are also available on the expansion ports so you can draw current here for your devices attached. |
|
|
|
|
#198 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi gents!
I have now approximate pricing information for the DSP board including software. To be confirmed! - between USD 260 and USD 290 for the board without analogue volume. - between USD 280 and USD 330 for the board with analogue volume (CS3318). Shipping comes on top in all cases. For UE buyers, add 15% VAT. I'll order a production run soon so that I can start delivering in October if there's no major shortage of chips. I need to have a feel of what proportion of boards should get the analogue volume chip mounted on it, so I'd like to ask you whether you would prefer a board with the CS3318, or without that chip in order to save about USD 40. (If there's no analogue volume chip, the DACs are in charge of the volume control in digital domain - so there's still volume control, no worries). This is not an order request or whatever, it's just for me to have a feel of how many CS3318 I should buy. So unless you don't need a DSP board at all, don't be shy to give your input. It's a kind of poll - I'm not going to contact anyone who's taking part. My initial guess is fifty-fifty. |
|
|
|
#199 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Ystad
|
All right, I enlist for a board with the CS3318. I'm quite new to posting here but I've followed this thread with interest. Exciting!
|
|
|
|
#200 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
I'll take a complete board
Have you decided on what op-amps to use ?If I'm using opamps at all I kind of like the "LT 1361". |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DSP Xover project | chaparK | Digital Line Level | 141 | 3rd July 2011 10:16 AM |
| Help Please for simple active Xover project | dcathro | Analog Line Level | 4 | 9th September 2010 05:47 AM |
| Violet DSP Evolution - an Open Baffle Project | cuibono | Multi-Way | 211 | 18th May 2010 02:26 AM |
| Software digital DSP ... Xover/filters/EQ ?? | JinMTVT | Digital Source | 2 | 8th October 2004 06:02 AM |
| DSP card & proper xover for heathkit 859A speaker cabinet | x. onasis | Multi-Way | 6 | 22nd April 2003 07:39 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |