|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
Why are there only disastrous PCB Versions for TDA7293/TDA7294/LM3886 etc. available?
There are an extremly wide range of PCBs and Kits available for this and similar other monolitic audio amp ICs. For me unfortunately the position of the copper conductor tracks are absolutely disadvantageous by all examples, which are to find by Google image search - go to audio amplifier tda7293 - Google Search audio amplifier tda7294 - Google Search lm3886 - Google-Suche By this high resolution example - go to F200# Audio Enthusiasts DIY AMP TDA7293 Amplifier Board for sale you will see, that the positive voltage supply rail and the negative rail goes very close to the signal pads and inverted input pad for NFB. Additional there are only cheap caps for the power supply in use without screw terminals. Consequently a certain standart of sonic quality cannot be exceeded. By all showed images unfortunately this situation I note. I am almost certain, that nothing of the showed versions from image-search sounds really good (at best like Linn's LK85 in genuine condition - i. e. with original part and wire equipment). After performed tweacking of Linn's power amp model LK85 (equipped with TDA7294V) I observe an exceptionally enhancement by sound quality due to additional use of caps with screw terminals and change the routing of the wires for the main voltage rails. According to my requirements four holes would be drilled in the PCB near by the pins 13 and 15 in case of TDA7293/TDA7294 (in opposite of the sensitive area). The cans of the caps must go downward (solder side/bottom side) and the screws for the caps must be screwed from the component/top side. Then I avoid interchanges between the (very short) supply rails to the sensitive areas and I get the possibility to use top class capacitors in outlines like that from http://www.audiocap.co.uk/ekmps/shop...0a153ke063.gif or http://s.eeweb.com/resized/images/re...76_455_332.png instead low cost high CV versions in "snap in" outline. Are such printed circuit boards really still not available ?? If yes, is this unbelievable. OTOH - there are too many copies of copies (clones of clones), particularly in far east. Where is the excellent engineering from early days concerning proper PCB design ?? Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 3rd November 2012 at 02:52 PM. |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Israel
|
__________________
The missing link between lead and gold in alchemist's world was BS and commerce. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2008
|
As for XY LM3886 kits, I do not know if this PCB can be considered as desastrous or not though the sound is five stars as is, i.e. no mods.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: D-55629 Schwarzerden
|
Quote:
Here an other example in the right direction; Jeff Rowland's wiring diagram of Concentra/Concentra II and Model 10 looks interesting Jeff Rowland LM3886 Amplifiers hifi-advice.com Last edited by tiefbassuebertr; 4th November 2012 at 09:33 AM. |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: May 2006
|
I suppose it should only be considered "Disasterous" if the curcuit self-destructs or at the very least sounds like crap , but a lot of PCB"s don"t follow every rule of proper PCB design and work just fine and sound just fine .....
The PCB in the TDA7293 Datasheet isn"t a particularly well designed PCB (though is was odviously designed by an engineer) but the PCB works and sounds just fine ...... I suppose to some poeple it is more important that a PCB follow all proper conventions of PCB design than the actual performance of the PCB ...... |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Israel
|
If making the PCBs, why not make 'em better?
Anyone else got a good chipamp pcb/schematics examples? tiefbassuebertr, i'm laying-out some lm3886 right now, this one (latest published) - http://s3t.it/data/uploads/lm3886v5.jpg The trimpot is next to opamp right now. http://s3t.it/data/uploads/lm3886_v4.pdf LM3886 regulated u-Gainclone This one is wrong too? (criticism is welcome)
__________________
The missing link between lead and gold in alchemist's world was BS and commerce. |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
|
Quote:
For chipamps layout is not as critical as it is for SMPS's and Class D amps, now there you can see some disasterous layouts. |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Canandaigua, NY USA
|
How close is close? If the supply is well filtered and doesn't have a lot of noise on it, and if the capacitance and leakage between the traces is low, there shouldn't be any problem. Phase also matters. Can you define a rule for length and distance that divides acceptable and unacceptable?
__________________
I used to be an audiophool like you but then I took an arrow to the knee. |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Israel
|
I don't know 'bout other ICs, but LM3886 has it's output/PS pins nicely aligned pretty far from it's input. That should be the least distance between high-current and low-current nodes.
Yet, keeping the PS rails close to ground/each other has more significance than extending the distance between high-current and low-current nodes. /imho/
__________________
The missing link between lead and gold in alchemist's world was BS and commerce. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blackburn, Lancs
|
For low level analogue a minimum of 3W where W the general track to track spacing, and the basic track width, this allows a guard track between the two signal traces.
The best way if forthe engineer to put this information onto (or better still built in) to the schematic. When doing sensitive audio (or other analog designs) I use different trace codes for different signals, usually "mic" for low level, "line" for higher level signalsand so on, the engineer draws the schematic using the defined codes, then when you lay the board out you can see the different signals in pretty colours defining the different types of signals. So you dont route a mic trace near a line traceor use more space betweenthe different signals to avoid cross talk and other interference. For digital the same basic rules apply, but for sensitive digitalsignals such as clocks, also on digital I have various EMC advisores and simulation toolsthat we can use to checkthe whole layout. |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TDA7294 + Power Transistors AMP (TDA7293 to come also) | dr frost dk | Chip Amps | 123 | 7th June 2013 08:45 PM |
| TDA7293/TDA7294 - by which commercial integrated Stereo Amps in use ? | tiefbassuebertr | Chip Amps | 9 | 23rd January 2013 01:54 AM |
| Differences between TDA7293 and TDA7294???? | Leolabs | Chip Amps | 1 | 22nd December 2006 10:12 AM |
| TDA7294 TDA7293 LM3668 Spice | micijanus | Analogue Source | 0 | 4th May 2002 03:13 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |