|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
This amp is the complementary version of this one:
SE class A regulator-chip-amp madness Now, the L-R correlation is used to modulate the current source, with L and R having opposite polarities (the loads must also have their polarities reversed). This version no more qualifies as a true single-ended (it is a sort of hybrid), but it has more output power and even less (simulated) THD than the previous circuit. An actual prototype will follow soon.
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Midwest in the USA
|
I'd prefer the LT1115, for lower distortion. Why have blocking caps (C2) in feedback R's and use a low voltage offset op-amp? I'd bet they are not needed.
I hate cap. coupled outputs but I listened to one for years. Heathkit AA-15. Was OK.... How is the performance at clip? At Current limit? Difficult load (1uf)??? I don't believe LTSpice simulations for a minute of devices like this. Performance is so model dependent and many complex devices are modeled simplistically with many "features" omitted for ease of model generation. |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
|
I can not 100% understand. The circuit shows 2 x 8 Ohm resistors but has only one input.
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
Quote:
This may not be the case for this circuit in this form, but it could be achieved without too much difficulty. The same cannot be said of your usual chip amp. Quote:
The prototype for this particular circuit hasn't been built yet, but it's in the pipeline, and I will report the results. Last edited by Elvee; 25th July 2011 at 08:06 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
This is just to illustrate how the circuit works by exploiting the correlation normally present between L and R signals. I will include a "working" schematic, as in the previous topic, with the L and R channels fully separated. One input signal should go to the top amplifier, and the other to the bottom one, and the phases of each speaker should be reversed wrt. one another. |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ruhrgebiet
|
I have also problems to understand the circuit.
Wondering first why the phase reversed input is not shown, but you show a full stereo design, not a symmetrical input and bridged output. Hope your "working" schematic will clear a little bit. 1543 |
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
Here is the way things are supposed to be connected in "real" use: |
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Scottish Borders
|
lt1056 is shown on the schematic.
What parameters are important if looking at a substitute opamp?
__________________
regards Andrew T. |
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Ruhrgebiet
|
Quote:
One more question. To make this more usable (not only for headphone amp) it is necessary to multiply the number of regulators. Is all to do to parallel them and use a 0.2Ohm resistor in each output? 1543 |
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
|
Quote:
From my prototypes, I use TL072 or LF353. This already gives an excellent quality, because the power elements behave like near-perfect depletion-mode MOSFETs having a very high transconductance. But the ultimate quality will be detemined by the op-amp: 1), because it sets the performance floor, and 2), because its loop gain will correct the remaining non-linearities from the regulators. In short, the better the op-amp, the higher the performance. Using a NE5532 would certainly improve things. Quote:
Of course, the 0.2R will reduce the transconductance of the regulators, but if a number of them are parallelled, this is not too important. And because the amplifier is class A, and the 0.2R resistance is purely linear, there won't be adverse effects like in a class AB amplifier. One note of caution: This version hasn't been physically tested yet, and it is very likely that it also requires a stabilization network, like the previous ones. |
||
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| which version aleph class -A amp is easy to buld? | space2000 | Pass Labs | 6 | 25th June 2008 10:01 AM |
| class d chip amp | sagarverma | Chip Amps | 19 | 23rd October 2005 05:08 PM |
| new class T chip amp | DJNUBZ | Class D | 1 | 17th October 2005 10:05 AM |
| How important is complementary transistor pair matching in class B amp? | caesar148 | Solid State | 10 | 15th October 2004 07:06 PM |
| my new chip amp version | lohk | Chip Amps | 3 | 26th March 2004 07:53 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |
| Page generated in 0.14305 seconds (74.99% PHP - 25.01% MySQL) with 11 queries |