Go Back   Home > Forums > Amplifiers > Chip Amps
Home Forums Rules Articles Store Gallery Blogs Register Donations FAQ Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Chip Amps Amplifiers based on integrated circuits

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11th March 2003, 07:17 PM   #31
Previously: Kuei Yang Wang
 
ThorstenL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Somewhere nice on planet earth
Hi,

Quote:
Originally posted by Asen
Kuei

What does it mean? A bridge, made of pairs of diodes, or what?
Of course not. Full Wave Rectification means full wave rectification. See attached, this shows the configuration of a single of the at least two supplies.

Sayonara
Attached Images
File Type: gif gcpsu.gif (4.1 KB, 2318 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2003, 07:24 PM   #32
Bricolo is offline Bricolo  France
diyAudio Member
 
Bricolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Grenoble, FR
why should we use dual diodes instead of single ones?


someone said in this topic, that discrete components are better, since you can match them
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2003, 07:38 PM   #33
2Bak is offline 2Bak  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denmark
Quote:
Originally posted by Kuei Yang Wang

Two Bridges. If you use more than two life becomes interesting.
It's basically one Bridge (or better discrete diodes) per secondary.

My personal recommendation for gainclones BTW is to use two moderatly sized (80VA or so) Torroids per channel, each using full wave rectification with Dual Schottky Diodes to give one single Voltage.

So a 2-Channel "clone" has four transformers, 4pcs Dual Schottky Diodes (and 4pcs of Supply Capacitors).

I just like to use loads of Iron. It works for me.

Sayonara

Thanks at lot !! That explains why my fuses keeps blowing when I have more than one chanell hooked up. See pic, where I use six (!) bridges in parallel for three channels. I will try with two bridges only ;-)

/Jan
Attached Images
File Type: jpg four.jpg (52.6 KB, 2199 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2003, 07:45 PM   #34
chiily is offline chiily  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Malvern
Does it fly?
__________________
H&Ks
Garf.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2003, 10:23 PM   #35
2Bak is offline 2Bak  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denmark
Quote:
Originally posted by chiily
Does it fly?
It rocks !

Sound is good. I am gonna use this three-channel as amp for surround and center speakers.
Details: This circuit. MU metal around toroid, 300VA. LM3875T. No special components. Roedenstein film caps, normal metal films. Standard 1000uF caps. Caddock 0,2 in output.
Case is from an old tube pre-amp, Audio Innovations
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 2.jpg (52.0 KB, 2123 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2003, 10:24 PM   #36
2Bak is offline 2Bak  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denmark
...another
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 3.jpg (59.9 KB, 2085 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2003, 10:29 PM   #37
2Bak is offline 2Bak  Denmark
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Denmark
last one
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 4.jpg (40.0 KB, 1984 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th March 2003, 11:35 PM   #38
diyAudio Retiree
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain or the pueblo of Los Angeles
Default Burning you bridges behind you

At the risk of further confusion I thought I would jump off... um actually into; the great bridge debate. First off is the ground is used as a references to the other voltages on a schematic and the ground paths seldom show in detail on most schematics. the large charging currents from then transformer secondariness mean the even return wiring resistance of a few milliohms can result in significant voltages between the ground reference for input cable ground, speaker return grounds, filter capacitor grounds, and amplifier input and feedback ground points.

Referencing the top figure in the schematic included: the wiring resistances for the return path between the transformer secondary center tap and the filter caps ground terminals are given as Rw1 for filter C1 and Rw2 for filter C2. As the charging current to the filter caps is returned through the wiring resistance Rw1 and Rw2 a voltage is developed between the capacitor ground terminals that is given by Vcapgnd1 - Vcapgnd2. This voltage appears the across resistances for the ground returns described above as given by Rw3 though Rw8 as the ration for return resistances Rw3/ Rw3 to Rw7/Rw8 can easily differ from unity and the various ground reference voltages given by Vgnd3 to Vgnd6 will be at different voltages due to the Vcapgnd1 - Vcapgnd2 drop across the unequal resistances Rw3 to Rw8.

A thick plate of a low resistance material is often used to tie these ground returns together and minimize the ground return resistances. I worked on a BandK amp where ground return wires contained ring terminals that were connected to the chassis with a large screw and nut. The order in which these terminals were placed on this screw made a difference in the measured 120Hz noise at the outputs.

Referencring to the bottom figure on the schematic of the two bridge circuit, it is seen that the return currents through rw1 and Rw2 are galvanically isolated by the seperate secondary windings. Thecapacitor charging currents do return not return through the the series combination of Rw1 and Rw2 so that the Vcapgnd1 - Vcapgnd2 drop due the charging current is zero. Either method will work but the single brige requires much greater attention to the ground return path. Hopefully this shred some light into why getting the hum out of an amp requires close attention to the grounding scheme. Hopefully it will also help to explain single point grounding and the use of transformers to isolate ground loops. More likely that it will get me thrown back into the sin bin.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg single_dual_ bridge.jpg (27.8 KB, 2599 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2003, 12:46 AM   #39
diyAudio Senior Member
 
fdegrove's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Belgium
Default BUT FRED...

Hi,

Quote:
More likely that it will get me thrown back into the sin bin.
Why would that be?

This same topology I use in OTL amps, it does make a lot of sense to me.

Nice work,
__________________
Frank
  Reply With Quote
Old 12th March 2003, 12:52 AM   #40
grataku is offline grataku  United States
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: -
Fred,
that was a lucid, concise and to the point explanation that was overdue in this thread. Looking forward for more of the same from you on other, equally important issues. No reason to evoke sinbin memories here, just keep the 'Hmmmm's to a minimum.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
two bridges on one secondary jpfastre Solid State 10 3rd January 2007 08:13 PM
Anybody heard about Tarzian Silicon Rectifier for Tube Rectifier Replacement? zxx123 Tubes / Valves 4 21st February 2005 04:02 AM
Are dual rectifier bridges useful? runebivrin Solid State 25 23rd February 2004 11:56 PM
2 or 4 bridges? Raka Chip Amps 23 6th June 2003 08:13 PM
Why two bridges are better than one? Andypairo Pass Labs 14 15th October 2002 12:25 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Page generated in 0.11778 seconds (81.87% PHP - 18.13% MySQL) with 11 queries

Copyright ©1999-2012 diyAudio