|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Across the river from Rip's big old tree...
|
Hi there everybody,
I'm hoping for a pointer to where I can read up on the proper termination of MC step-up transformers. I'm lucky enough to have a pair of Tamura TKS-27 input transformers. I also have a Denon DL103 cartridge. According to Discussion on MC Cartridge Loading, the proper input impedance for a DL103 is 100 ohms. OK, the TKS-27 has a 150 ohm primary, which should be close enough. So, my question is... If the TKS-27 transformer says its secondary impedance is 100k ohms, is it OK to terminate it into the typical 47k load resistor on the input of the phono preamp? Or... Since this is a step-up *ratio* we're talking about here, am I then effectively turning that nominally 100k secondary into a 47k secondary, and I need to adjust which primary I use to compensate? It would seem to me that terminating a 100k secondary with a 47k ohm resistor would be trouble. Am I doing this wrong? My phono preamp probably has a pretty high input capacitance. The input tube is a triode-wired 6J52P, with a 9k plate resistor, IR LED for cathode bias, 15mA plate current. I have been using the preamp with a 1000 ohm input load resistor (grid leak resistor) and a Denon DL110 (high output MC cartridge, 160 ohm output Z). Thanks for any help. As you can tell, I haven't done this SUT thing before... -- |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Across the river from Rip's big old tree...
|
I did find this -- Sowter Type 8055
It seems a zobel network may be necessary across the SUT secondary. How to figure the correct one for a TKS-27? -- |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Web link with calculator mh-audio.nl - Home
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Across the river from Rip's big old tree...
|
Hey merlin, thanks.
I'm confused. My SUT has primaries labeled as 150R, 200R and 300R. Secondary is labeled as 100k. The turns ratio is not stated in its specs -- http://www.op316.com/tubes/datalib/tamura-200009.pdf I need to figure the step up ratio. Using the impedances, I figure that for the 300R primary, it's 300:100,000. 100,000/300 = 333 1:333 <-- ??? That can't be right. How do I figure the 'step-up ratio' of this Tamura TKS-27 SUT? -- Last edited by rongon; 3rd February 2013 at 02:24 PM. |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Tamura pdf don't stated turns ratio. Yes you are calculating well the ratio.
150R - 100K = 1:666,66 200R - 100K = 1:500 300R - 100K = 1:333,33 |
|
|
|
#6 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Across the river from Rip's big old tree...
|
The problem is that those figures do not make any sense when plugged into the calculator on mh-audio.nl - Home.
I think the gain is the square root of that 1:333.33 impedance ratio (square root of 333), which equals approximately +18.4dB of gain. So, the "natural impedance" calculated for the TKS-27 using the 300R pri and the 100k sec is about 680R. That is a rather high load for a Denon DL103 with output Z of around 40R. The question is whether a zobel network will be necessary across the TKS-27 secondary windings. -- |
|
|
|
#7 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
The ratio seems to high for a MC Step-Up, are you sure is a step-up MC transfomrer 50,45dBs!!!!!.
I'm using Denon DL103R with a Partridge 977 1:6 ratio & is enough gain for my MM phono preamp. |
|
|
|
#8 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Across the river from Rip's big old tree...
|
Tamura TKS-27 is 100% a MC cartridge step-up transformer. Supposedly used by Sakuma, et al with a Denon DL103 cartridge.
I think the step-up ratio is equal to the "x factor" in that calculator, so when using the 300R primary, the TKS-27's step-up ratio is actually about 1:8 or thereabouts. My problem will not be getting enough gain. I've got plenty of gain available. My goal is to get the load impedance set just right for the DL103 so I don't get overshoot on square waves (odd order harmonic generation). Thanks for helping me with this! -- |
|
|
|
#9 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
|
Hi
You can calculate the step up ratio as follows:- Primary impedance = Load Impedance/(step up ratio) squared. So for a 100K load impedance and a primary impedance of 150R the step up will be 1:26. For 200 R the step up is 1:22 and for 300R the step up is 1:18. If my maths is right of course If you want the correct load for the Denon you will have to adjust the load impedance accordingly. Zobels across the secondary are used to damp the resonance caused by the transformers leakage inductance and winding capacitance. For most signal level transformers its at about 100Khz. The load resistance will not be small enough to damp this so its usual to add a zoblel (series resistance and capacitance) to provide the neccesary damping resistance (say 6.8K) at the resonant frequency without affecting the load impedance. Hope this helps. |
|
|
|
#10 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Across the river from Rip's big old tree...
|
Does a 47k grid resistor (the phono preamp "load resistor") across the SUT secondary change the secondary's impedance?
-- |
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Step-up MC transformer for Audio Research SP 6C | Cassiel | Tubes / Valves | 8 | 4th November 2012 10:03 AM |
| Tango MCT-999 MC Cartridge Step-Up Transformer Wiring Help | HP8903B | Analogue Source | 8 | 29th March 2012 04:19 PM |
| Proper load resistor for I/V secondary? | phrarod | Digital Line Level | 9 | 15th July 2010 12:03 PM |
| Load Resistance as seen by PSU?? | Zero Cool | Solid State | 8 | 22nd September 2004 05:04 AM |
| Proper Bypassing for a Virtual ground Load | ppl | Chip Amps | 0 | 31st October 2003 03:53 AM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |