Solid state phono preamp design philosophy - diyAudio
Go Back   Home > Forums > Source & Line > Analogue Source

Analogue Source Turntables, Tonearms, Cartridges, Phono Stages, Tuners, Tape Recorders, etc.

Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.

Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 28th April 2008, 10:18 AM   #1
PMA is offline PMA  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
PMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague
Default Solid state phono preamp design philosophy

Gentlemen,

I would like to open a discussion on this topic. MC phono preamp, solid-state.

- active/passive equalization
- discrete/opamp
- BJT/JFET, which position
- power supply, active PSU filter
- enclosure, shielding properties
- wiring, grounding
- SE/balanced
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 11:37 AM   #2
diyAudio Member
 
Jan Dupont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Send a message via MSN to Jan Dupont
This will be interesting

I we choose to go for an opamp version, then it must be active equalization with BTJ buffered balanced output.

Some kind af active PSU filtering is a must...

Regarding to shielding, wiring and grounding, maybe it better to take this up, when we know where we are heading
__________________
Free Schematic and Service Manual downloads www.audio-circuit.dk, Company: www.dupont-audio.com, Joint venture: www.DupontMantra.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 11:54 AM   #3
AMV8 is offline AMV8  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: near london
Hi

I guess I would choose a pre amp uilt from discrete devices.

I would go for passive equalisation. The only reason to avoid passive normally is that the pre amp sees a high input resistor, which means resistor noise, but that can be avoided by circuit design.

I have always had a preference for transistors - I simply prefer the sound. However fets do seem to transfer more detail on occasions. I would like to try both in an mc pre.

Don
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 12:15 PM   #4
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
No the reason to avoid passive EQ is because it massively wastes headroom and requires lots of gain.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 12:38 PM   #5
AMV8 is offline AMV8  United Kingdom
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: near london
Richie

I do not agree with you.

Maybe it is better to simply give your views than to criticise the views of others.

This is a forum for all to enjoy. It is also audio and there are few/no absolutes except for what sounds best - which is again a personal view. In my case I am an engineer with over 50 years design and construct ( and listening and enjoying ) experience in audio.

Don
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 01:54 PM   #6
Did it Himself
diyAudio Member
 
richie00boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gloucestershire, England, UK
I did not intend to criticise, I don't know where that impression came from.
__________________
www.readresearch.co.uk my website for UK diy audio people - designs, PCBs, kits and more.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 03:24 PM   #7
PMA is offline PMA  Europe
diyAudio Member
 
PMA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Prague
Jan,

there are examples of opamp phono preamp circuits with combination of active and passive equalization as well, divided into 2 opamp gain stages.
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 03:51 PM   #8
diyAudio Member
 
Jan Dupont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Send a message via MSN to Jan Dupont
PMA;

I know, but if we going to use opamps why not then use full active equalization ?
__________________
Free Schematic and Service Manual downloads www.audio-circuit.dk, Company: www.dupont-audio.com, Joint venture: www.DupontMantra.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 04:21 PM   #9
diyAudio Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Columbia, SC
Quote:
Originally posted by richie00boy
No the reason to avoid passive EQ is because it massively wastes headroom and requires lots of gain.

Hmmm...another student who slept his way through RIAA 101. the choice of active EQ invokes the same gain loss as passive EQ--roughly 20dB at 1kHz. That's inherent in the RIAA curve. Headroom problems are a function of circuit design and are easily avoided. Go back to sleep, someone will wake you when the bell rings and it's time to go home for the day.

The phono stage I've been working on fits into the discrete/passive/balanced category. You can use a balanced circuit as single ended, but there's no way to use a single ended circuit as balanced unless you specifically add extra circuitry to generate the balanced signal. It'd be nice if cartridges had center taps on the coils, but we'll just have to do without. It can be done.
I've got a chip (AD797 and AD...something with a JFET front end, I forget the number...843?) single ended, passive circuit. Nothing exotic or weird about it. Somewhere around here I have a tube RIAA, but since I use moving coils it was noisier than I cared to live with. Could have gone hybrid and used a 2SK170 in the front end, but wanted to keep it all tube. Besides, you're wanting solid state, so I'll leave the tube dingus on the shelf. I'm not even sure where the silly thing is, anyway.

Grey
  Reply With Quote
Old 28th April 2008, 04:51 PM   #10
gain is offline gain  United States
diyAudio Member
 
gain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
just my opinion ...

- active/passive equalization
passive. less active components is less possibility for noise and less complexity.

- discrete/opamp
discrete. nothing wrong with op amps, just prefer to roll my own.

- BJT/JFET, which position
i like the sound of bipolar better. purely subjective choice.

- power supply, active PSU filter
linear regulated power supply is least noise. active PSU filter would be nice.

- enclosure, shielding properties
- wiring, grounding
- SE/balanced

like ACD says, cross those bridges when we come to them.
  Reply With Quote

Reply


Hide this!Advertise here!
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diy Solid State Preamp Pocoyo Solid State 21 17th July 2007 03:53 AM
Solid state preamp gchrist Solid State 4 7th April 2004 10:19 AM


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT. The time now is 04:27 PM.


vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2014 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 diyAudio

Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2