|
|||||||
| Home | Forums | Rules | Articles | Store | Gallery | Blogs | Register | Donations | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Search |
| Analog Line Level Preamplifiers , Passive Pre-amps, Crossovers, etc. |
|
Please consider donating to help us continue to serve you.
Ads on/off / Custom Title / More PMs / More album space / Advanced printing & mass image saving |
|
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#161 | |||
|
diyAudio Member
|
Quote:
That could POTENTIALLY initiate an oscillation, which is also not the case, because both times it happened to me - it happened while nobody touched inputs or outputs. But seems that you managed to detect the heat-up in time, so none of your IC went dead? I wasn't so lucky. Quote:
Quote:
So far, as potential counter-measuers, I'm going to apply a CLC mains filter and better filtering for digital power rails of PGA. Also thinkin' about shorting inputs to ground when in standby. Last edited by Vikt0r; 12th March 2010 at 02:37 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#162 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: santa clara, CA
|
sadly, I have not done enough fault isolation. ALL my builds have been mostly done just so I can do some driver development (lol) and so if the volume varied at all, my proto was good enough for me
but I did do an rmaa test on one of mine and it came in as clean as the base equip (RME firewire box as the a/d and d/a). it was impressive and I was hopeful. I ran a few variants of the chip on some test hardware and lived with it for months and months. usually, it would keep working fine; but sometimes the 'overheating' thing would happen and I could hear it very clearly (shot noise and no audio) in the speaker. that would trigger me to get on my feet and yank power out I don't think I fried any chips but I certainly thought I did, many times.I always blamed my perf board layouts or bad local bypass electros or the rail splitter (TLE) or something. I think my software was ok (lol) but I never ever trusted my own hacked up power supplies. I do think this chip series has great potential; but I also think there's a lot more tlc needed to get it running and running *well* and I wasn't in the right stage of my project to throw lots of time at this (I went with a relay approach; for now; deferring the pga until the relay stuff was done) ![]() one of my next trials was to see if any of the packaged dc-dc's would take my nice 5v and make 2 'analog fives' from it that are clean enough (once some filtering happens) to be used. I really don't like having to supply a dual rail, especially since boxes like this are more digital control than analog and 5v rules here. I never put time into playing with those dc-dc's and filters but that would be my next move. I'm still not sure the TLE that I used was all that great of an idea.
__________________
My Photostream:http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works/ |
|
|
|
|
#163 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Brussels
|
Quote:
I was further analysing your shunt circuit, but find the variance between the steps rather wide and variable. I probably missed something ![]() What I did was calculating all possible resistor combinations using your values (10, 100, 470, 4700 and 10k) for the resistors. Then I sorted them according to their attenuation factor and tried to select the interesting steps (in the beginning and the end 6 and 4 dB allowed, in the middle preferably 2 - 3 dB steps). The thing is: I can hardly find 32 steps that are significant and usable (I'm not going to use < 1dB steps suddenly followed by a 4dB step for example..). Attached my excel sheet with a graph showing the variance for each step called "Step(1->12)" varying up to 11dB and the total attenuation called "Att(0->70)" Do you have a similar varying step-size? Thanks for your help! Berny Last edited by Berny; 13th March 2010 at 06:41 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#164 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Hi
This week end I finished passive preamp with tone control. Original source code by danzup I took here Yet another Volume controlers and source selections Thanks Dan for the original passive preamp schematic
|
|
|
|
|
#165 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Schematic
|
|
|
|
|
#166 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bucuresti
|
Congratulation !
How do the passive tone controller sound ? Mine not ready , as I am involved now in another urgent project ! I see you only connected the + dB side ... ![]() I must find time for finishing this project .
__________________
There are not better tube than 6P3S and 6N2P for my ears ! Last edited by danzup; 15th March 2010 at 05:34 PM. |
|
|
|
|
#167 |
|
diyAudio Member
|
Danzup, it sounds good! I like it!!!
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
#168 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bucuresti
|
Passive Tone Control will be provided by following modules .
The micro-controller will be atmel atmega 16 with LCD , IR ,encoder and switches .
__________________
There are not better tube than 6P3S and 6N2P for my ears ! |
|
|
|
|
#169 |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Bucuresti
|
And the controller part :
__________________
There are not better tube than 6P3S and 6N2P for my ears ! |
|
|
|
|
#170 | |
|
diyAudio Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: santa clara, CA
|
Quote:
the focus of my work was more firmware and UI and this device was just a way to verify that things worked in reality. I hoped that I'd get time to try real pcb's (all my protos were perf or very hacked pcb) and that there would be more attention to the PSU and layout and all that. I felt that could be worked out but that my time was better spent playing in the firmware area.I can't really say that the device has issues or its just very sensitive to 'environment' and that I knew I had a sloppy environ and so I never went beyond that to figure it out. the TLE rail splitter (I think I always used that, btw) seemed to get hot during these strange periods and I mostly thought it could be a bad use of those in this application. I never had a true bipolar PSU, I derived gnd from the TLE railsplitter chip. I'm not really an analog guy (as you could guess) and so nothing could be implied by working or not-working on any perf version I throw together I was surprised things worked at all, to be honest.but what I can say is: things would be fine for a long time. for days and weeks I'd use my software and this vol control chip and things sounded 'fine' to me. then, some burst of static and nothing I could do via the software would bring it out, only a power down, wait, power up. then things were fine. after a while I stopped doing firmware updates (I liked the code the way it was) and then just became a user of the device. again, weeks and weeks would go by without any problem until the static and mandatory reboot was needed.
__________________
My Photostream:http://www.flickr.com/photos/linux-works/ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| source selector / volume hum in Aikido | cbutterworth | Tubes / Valves | 1 | 28th March 2007 07:34 AM |
| Source for volume knobs? | Alois | Pass Labs | 4 | 3rd July 2005 05:12 PM |
| IC Controlers for Class D Power stage | frozenpod1 | Class D | 14 | 17th May 2005 03:25 PM |
| Swichable source and volume pot. Whats the best way? | sounder | Chip Amps | 2 | 22nd September 2003 06:29 PM |
| detented volume pots... source? | Mach_Y | Parts | 2 | 1st June 2003 05:23 PM |
| New To Site? | Need Help? |