see title.
thanks for the help.
ps. looking at the schematic (http://www.tubecad.com/2006/04/27/aikido_high_impedance_headphone_amplifier.png) and my limited knowledge,
I am thinking: R1, R3, R4, R8, R9 and R14.
thanks for the help.
ps. looking at the schematic (http://www.tubecad.com/2006/04/27/aikido_high_impedance_headphone_amplifier.png) and my limited knowledge,
I am thinking: R1, R3, R4, R8, R9 and R14.
Really? Interesting, I've never simulated a circuit that had signal current in all its resistors (at least that wasn't many orders of magnitude lower).
If you read Borbely's articles, he points out which resistors to spend money on as are in the signal path; for examle, http://www.borbelyaudio.com/pics/405borbely2506.pdf in the parts list notice some say RN60 as the type.
If you read Borbely's articles, he points out which resistors to spend money on as are in the signal path; for examle, http://www.borbelyaudio.com/pics/405borbely2506.pdf in the parts list notice some say RN60 as the type.
Something bugs me about that circuit. As someone told me in the IRC channel, C4 carries a lot of signal current. So how is that any better than using an output cap then? Seems to me it would be better to have no cap and a very low output impedance regulator instead.
I remember Borskie from Tubecad Journal once tested a regulator and though it sounded better without a cap after it. Hmm.
I remember Borskie from Tubecad Journal once tested a regulator and though it sounded better without a cap after it. Hmm.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- what resistors are in the aikido signal path