• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

The Impressive Vetruvio GM70 SET amp.

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
See this amp on Ebay this week and Iam impressed with the GM70 SET dual mono, it have a regular bulb lamp:bulb: in the output stage.
As you can see on the image below, there is a big light source inside the chassis.
As Iam not a expert in electronics this looks good to me. What are your opinion??
vetruvioaudio.com
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
 
Last edited:
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
It's been done, it's kind of inefficient and the linearity is just ok at best.. LF signals will severely modulate the hot filament resistance resulting in significant distortion. I wonder what sort of plate load these bulbs present to the output tube, (maybe slightly less than 5K for a pair of 240V/25W bulbs) and the RC coupling greatly limits the available plate voltage swing compared to choke loaded parafeed or a conventional output transformer.

In this case I think it is a ploy mostly to save the cost of a real output transformer designed to operate at these voltages. I am currently working on a fairly conventional GM70 amp design and have some trouble believing the claimed output power ratings for this topology - the lamp loaded ones I have encountered produced something like 1/4th the power of a conventional choke loaded parafeed or conventional output transformer. (RC loading will give you no more than 1/2 the voltage swing available with an inductive load hence the much lower power output)

Mine incidentally is good for not much more than 20W with 1kV @ 120mA (calculated) and has a conventional 7K:8ohm OPT.
 
Last edited:
Could this start a new hobby of lamp rolling?

Whoever wrote the blurb forgot to mention that any flickering of the lamp in normal operation is a sign of LF distortion and smearing. Normally people try very hard to eliminate storage effects from audio; here storage has been deliberately introduced. I just checked my calendar, but it isn't April 1st!
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Could this start a new hobby of lamp rolling?

Whoever wrote the blurb forgot to mention that any flickering of the lamp in normal operation is a sign of LF distortion and smearing. Normally people try very hard to eliminate storage effects from audio; here storage has been deliberately introduced. I just checked my calendar, but it isn't April 1st!

There was a fad here quite some years ago with parafeed tube amps with light bulb loads, they do look cool and if LF content is restricted do sound reasonably good. (The resistance of the light bulbs is highly non-linear at low frequencies though) Even Nelson Pass has done a FET amp with light bulbs..
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Why not just replace the bulbs with a CCS? Tho, I am not familiar with the ones that could handle 1KV+. And looks like an easy mod to 'Power Drive', if a negative voltage supply could be found. Do you have the power supply schematic?

There's no point to using power drive with this design or a CCS loaded output stage as the plate voltage swing is very limited compared to a transformer or choke that will let you swing almost close to ground to close to 2X the supply rail. A CCS will address the linearity issue but would have to be able to handle nearly the full 1kV across it at maximum output level. This in no way addresses the inefficiency of the design which because it has roughly half the available voltage swing capability of an inductor loaded design (choke or transformer) is going to produce about 1/4 of the output power a conventional or parafeed design.

CCS = constant current source
 
Last edited:
There's no point to using power drive with this design or a CCS loaded output stage as the plate voltage swing is very limited compared to a transformer or choke that will let you swing almost close to ground to close to 2X the supply rail. A CCS will address the linearity issue but would have to be able to handle nearly the full 1kV across it at maximum output level. This in no way addresses the inefficiency of the design which because it has roughly half the available voltage swing capability of an inductor loaded design (choke or transformer) is going to produce about 1/4 of the output power a conventional or parafeed design.

CCS = constant current source
Thanks Kevin for informing. I look forward your GM70 amp, seems very good, under 30W the GM70 tube will last many thousands hours.
Regards, Gustavo
 
In this case I think it is a ploy mostly to save the cost of a real output transformer designed to operate at these voltages.

If it is I fail to seethe logic behind it as obtaining same power from conventional SE arrangement will require significantly lower B+, thereboy reducing the difficultues of finding suitable transformer (I'm sure some stock transformers could be found with similar ratings).

Why bother with high power tube and then waste power with resistive parafeed ? :confused:
 
to get more output than parafeed with a low output tube :p but I suppose powerloss will be higher, if thats what you say

No, I meant to say that resistive load with high power tube such as GM70 is utterly pointless, you get half the output swing you would with the usual arrangement at same voltage so why bother if same result can be obtained with lower voltage, smaller tube and cheaper and safer design ? Halved output swing means one quarter of power.

It's like using a high torque tractor engine to power a lawnmower - you don't need the extra brute force to get the same result and the extra power/torque of heavier engine is just wasted for lugging itself around, while you're paying more for it. Above design is plain st00pid.
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Waste??? Did you not read the thread name? Whether we like it or not this form of marketing works quite successfully. So, maybe you are not the target market, plenty more fish in the sea :)

The parafeed also indicates no gap, could it be a PP transformer was reused?

It's a toroid, most likely a power transformer. This thing reeks of cheap.. (Which given the sales price it would have to be.)
 
Waste??? Did you not read the thread name? Whether we like it or not this form of marketing works quite successfully. So, maybe you are not the target market, plenty more fish in the sea :)

The parafeed also indicates no gap, could it be a PP transformer was reused?

Youse guys didn't read the description of the amp... It says right here that the lightbulb is a "linear" resistor and this circuit is actually twice as efficient as one using a conventional OPT and the tubes last twice as long, because it doesn't use the primary winding!

It uses a toroid for very high performance.

:rolleyes:
 

Attachments

  • datrutt.JPG
    datrutt.JPG
    26.3 KB · Views: 507
Last edited:
Let me see if I have understood this correctly:
- a light bulb is a "linear" resistor - I assume this is something different from a normal linear resistor, which a light bulb certainly isn't unless it is not glowing.
- a transformer is used, but it doesn't have a primary winding.
- halving dissipation in a Triode always doubles its life.
- the best way to halve dissipation in a Triode is not to use a lower HT and accept a lower power output, but to stick a resistor in series and accept an even lower power output.

Have I got all that? It feels like I have stumbled into a parallel universe, where the rules of physics are somewhat different. Maybe this amp was designed using alien technology, which is why we are having trouble understanding it.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.