SX-Amp and NX-Amp

www.hifisonix.com
Joined 2003
Paid Member
Solviken, that radiator is a bit thin.

Your heatsink length and width size is about right. Typically the solid part will be about 10 mm and then with the fins on top of that another 30 mm for a total depth of 40mm.

You of course can try it, but I think it will run hotter than it should for a class AB and the thermal stability will not be as good as it should be.

Can you post a picture

Anyway, good luck with your project!
 
Last edited:
SX

Is this ok or it is overkill ?
 

Attachments

  • DSC08122.JPG
    DSC08122.JPG
    577.1 KB · Views: 497
  • DSC08376.JPG
    DSC08376.JPG
    525.9 KB · Views: 98
  • DSC08377.JPG
    DSC08377.JPG
    533.1 KB · Views: 101
  • DSC08137.JPG
    DSC08137.JPG
    490.8 KB · Views: 412
  • DSC08133.JPG
    DSC08133.JPG
    549.1 KB · Views: 438
  • DSC08136.JPG
    DSC08136.JPG
    530 KB · Views: 461
  • DSC08135.JPG
    DSC08135.JPG
    532.2 KB · Views: 480
Nice looking chassis Thimios - looks like it will handle the sx-Amp well!
Hi Bonsai ,thanks for reply.
Can you advice me for proper installation way?
You prefer option 1 or 2.
Keep in mind that each heatsink consists of two smaller.(white line shows this.)
 

Attachments

  • DSC08133 (1).JPG
    DSC08133 (1).JPG
    136.3 KB · Views: 499
  • DSC08133.JPG
    DSC08133.JPG
    136.5 KB · Views: 492
Last edited:
www.hifisonix.com
Joined 2003
Paid Member
You can leave C1 off - it just filters any remaining HF noise from the offset adjust circuit out.

For the input transistors, the diamond buffer arrangement cancels 1st order Vbe and delta Vbe with temperature. So, in its basic state, it's already quite stable and provided there are not big temperature deltas across the transistors (which there are not in practice) they track over temperature very well. They are in close enough proximity to do the job very well in both the sx and nx amplifiers.

Follow the set up instructions in the build document.

In practice, when you switch on, the offset will be at max, and then after a minute or two will quickly settle down to within a few mV (4-5 mV) of its final value. After 5 -10 mins, it will be within 1-2 mV of 0.
 
Why is the cold offset bigger than the warm offset and then much big than the fully warmed offset?

Which components are responsible? Which parameters are responsible?

I ask for two reasons:
1. to know what to try to avoid in future.
2. I have in old DC servo Threads suggested that the amplifier, needing the servo to attenuate output offset, be set up to have zero (or very near zero) offset at switch on and for the servo to control the DC conditions so that as warm up progresses the servo applies correction to maintain that low, or near zero, offset.
 
Last edited:
www.hifisonix.com
Joined 2003
Paid Member
The sx and nx-amps are DC coupled - there is no servo. Instead, the DC offset is trimmed for 0 mV output when the amplifers are warmed up.

After initial calibration and set up, the offset at cold after any subsequent power up is around 40mV (measured on 8 protos and final amps for sx and nx amp). This is already quite low for a DC coupled, non servo'd design.

If you follow the offset calibration procedure, you will note that the offset is dialled out after the amplifer has warmed up and the heatsonks have reached their operating temperature (on the class AB nx-amp its around 10~15 degres above ambient at normal listening levels, and maybe 20 degrees on my iterations at higher power levels).

So, this is the reason the offset is at max on subsequent power-up cycles.

The gain of the nx-amp is about 34 x. So, with a ~40mV offet at switch on, this implies a total input stage offset is a little over 1mV (The sx-Amp gain is ~14x)

The repeatable output offset after the amps have warmed up are around 1~2 mV and > 80% of the initial offset settles out within 2~3 minutes of power up.
 
Last edited:
Sx

First channel housed and running .
Second on the road...
 

Attachments

  • DSC08388.JPG
    DSC08388.JPG
    576.3 KB · Views: 155
  • DSC08386.JPG
    DSC08386.JPG
    568.7 KB · Views: 154
  • DSC08385.JPG
    DSC08385.JPG
    495.9 KB · Views: 163
  • DSC08384.JPG
    DSC08384.JPG
    565.8 KB · Views: 183
  • DSC08382.JPG
    DSC08382.JPG
    600.2 KB · Views: 189
  • DSC08381.JPG
    DSC08381.JPG
    520.6 KB · Views: 373
  • DSC08380.JPG
    DSC08380.JPG
    568.4 KB · Views: 386
  • DSC08379.JPG
    DSC08379.JPG
    556 KB · Views: 396
  • DSC08389.JPG
    DSC08389.JPG
    588 KB · Views: 169
Last edited: