speaker protection

Attachments

  • layout.png
    layout.png
    27.7 KB · Views: 1,435
  • sch.png
    sch.png
    3.5 KB · Views: 1,459
  • protect pdf with film cap-Cu bottom.pdf
    170.7 KB · Views: 237
  • protect pdf with film cap-silk top.pdf
    371.1 KB · Views: 218
Last edited:
Here is an idea of passive circuit, based on a normally-closed relay avoiding further damages to the amplifier in the event of a fault:


Under normal conditions (no DC), the relay remains unenergized:

attachment.php


When DC is present, the relay is activated, opening its contacts:

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • DCprot1.png
    DCprot1.png
    77.2 KB · Views: 1,040
  • DCprot2.png
    DCprot2.png
    72.6 KB · Views: 850
Here is an idea of passive circuit, based on a normally-closed relay avoiding further damages to the amplifier in the event of a fault:


Under normal conditions (no DC), the relay remains unenergized:

attachment.php


When DC is present, the relay is activated, opening its contacts:

attachment.php
Good,very clever design! but in this case you need another mute circuit elsewhere ,maybe in the amplifier input.
Is it a pcb available?
 
Last edited:
Good,very clever design! but in this case you need another mute circuit elsewhere ,maybe in the amplifier input.
Why? This might be required for the previous examples, the ones shorting the output (although it risks being ineffective, if the amp's problem is such that it is completely unresponsive), but this ones opens the speaker's circuit all the time the voltage is present. In fact, the fault voltage serves to power the circuit.
Is it a pcb available?
No, I just cooked it now, it's still hot from the oven and hasn't been tested.

Another possibility would be to drive a bistable relay, but the rearming problem would need to be solved.
An elegant method would be to use a purely electromechanical residual current circuit breaker: there is a manual resetting lever that could be accessible on the rear of the speaker
 
Why? This might be required for the previous examples, the ones shorting the output (although it risks being ineffective, if the amp's problem is such that it is completely unresponsive), but this ones opens the speaker's circuit all the time the voltage is present. In fact, the fault voltage serves to power the circuit.

No, I just cooked it now, it's still hot from the oven and hasn't been tested.

Another possibility would be to drive a bistable relay, but the rearming problem would need to be solved.
An elegant method would be to use a purely electromechanical residual current circuit breaker: there is a manual resetting lever that could be accessible on the rear of the speaker
As a normally-closed relay used how the start-up noise will be avoided?
 
Last edited:
Let the amp builder handle that. A passive speaker protect has value by itself.
Indeed: this thread is about speaker protection, not anti-thump circuits, and anyway, how would the circuit know what is a power-on thump and what is part of the program, like violent percussions, explosion noise, etc?

Continuous DC for more than ~100ms is clearly pathological, but other than that....?
 
Perhaps with multple FETs in parallel the on resistance could be tamed?

Digikey carries the CPC3902 depletion FET. There's a price break at 25 and they're not expensive so we put 25 of them in parallel.

This would provide an effective on resistance of ~<0.1R, carry a pulse current capability of ~10A.

They'd be 'normally closed' and a dc-fault would be used to energize them.