• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Schmitt & CCS

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I'm doing a little design with a CCS on a LTP, and I was wondering, what is considered "good" for impedance of a CCS? I've ordered some parts and am gonna do some experimenting. I was looking into something like this, with the possibility of a FET or BJT as the active device. The FET I've ordered has an output capacitance Cds of 55pF (IRFBF20), which is about -j130kohms at 20KHz. If it doesn't work out with this, I will cascode with a proven design. The design current is 28mA.

So back to the question, what is acceptable for CCS capacitance and/or impedance? I don't have a spice program with tubes so it's hard for me to do any simulations.

thanks,
Micah
 
Ex-Moderator
Joined 2003
How long is a piece of string?

It all depends on application. Suppose you wanted an active anode load for an ECC83. You'd want at least 50 x ra = 4M. What about capacitance? Well, if you were only concerned with audio, you might feel that a shunt capacitance with a reactance that equalled the 4Mresistance at 100kHz would be required. C = 1/2pifX = 0.4pF. Quite small.

Conversely, you might need a CCS as an active load for a 6C45, in which case, you could scale the resistance and capacitance by a factor of 50 and say that 80k would be fine and 20pF would be fine.

I hope you can see that what you have to do is to determine the effect of an imperfect CCS on the circuit and decide what is acceptable.
 
missattached....

take two
 

Attachments

  • ccs.jpg
    ccs.jpg
    15.9 KB · Views: 286
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Ready

Ok, I made a double one with on board rectifier and filter cap. I went through 10s of red, green, & yellow LEDS. Reds are 1.43V-1.53V forward voltage drop and vary the most. Greens are 1.74V-1.75V and vary very little, ambers are 1.70V and vary very very little. I chose 2 identical amber ones. I was lucky to find a couple of strong hfe BC550Cs in my stash so they keep hfe*hfe product high enough in combination with the mild hfe 240 123APs I had (thanks EC8010).
This little board is going to be tested soon, draining a 12AT7 Schmidt phase splitter in a finished amp of mine. That amp already measures a low 1.5% AC Balance offset, so it is going to be a passive VS active current drain comparison mainly. I have to clear space and rewire in there etc. So I will let you know of the sonic results in due time.
 

Attachments

  • double6macascccs.jpg
    double6macascccs.jpg
    81.2 KB · Views: 302
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Thanks! The lower I go with the resistors, the sim shows degraded AC balance on the splitter outputs. But I will parallel the 27k resistors with 2k2 ones so I will jump from 0.15mA to 2mA through the LED. I hope this will prevent any noise issues to a good degree.
 
diyAudio Chief Moderator
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Listened to it.

I made a new combo mini board with 2 cascode BJT CCSs along with a fix bias control circuit to implement in my freshly reworked KT88 amp. Svein_B recently had a thread about 100Hz IMD intrusion in the voltage reference, concluding that it takes regulation on B+ and -CCS supply for things to be optimal. So I used a Giaime Ugliano Mosfet Maida for the first stages and I regulated at -30V with a LM337T for the CCS tail, tapping off the fix bias PSU. LED works at 5mA. The CCS drains a 12AT7 pair at 3mA each, @ 340V B+.
The sonic conclusions are: No loss of liquidity compared to the resistor tail. Noticeably better slam in the bass to mid bass, more tactile and revealing mid - high. More organized depth and hall cues. In general a surely precise but not artificial sound. No added harshness, enhanced sense of tranquility, better control during transients.
 

Attachments

  • combo.jpg
    combo.jpg
    96.8 KB · Views: 190
Re: Listened to it.

salas said:

No loss of liquidity compared to the resistor tail. Noticeably better slam in the bass to mid bass, more tactile and revealing mid - high. More organized depth and hall cues. In general a surely precise but not artificial sound. No added harshness, enhanced sense of tranquility, better control during transients.

Gee man, I’m jealous. Need to redo my 6550
:rolleyes:
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.