http://blog.stereophile.com/rmaf2007/101307watt/
There are some breadcrumbs about the Special Crossover....
Looks like Nelson opted for a 1st order passive line level crossover for the Lowthers...What is surprising is the 60Hz highpass??
What's the lowpass freq?
Vix
There are some breadcrumbs about the Special Crossover....
Looks like Nelson opted for a 1st order passive line level crossover for the Lowthers...What is surprising is the 60Hz highpass??
What's the lowpass freq?
Vix
Hi,
I was surprised because I expected something around 100-150Hz for the highpass. (at least)
However, Nelson took a different approach. By crossing so low he actually made the Lowther work almost full-range. 60Hz might be the point where it short-cuts, so anyway it wouldn't be making much below that. High-pass seems to be there just to relieve the Lowther of doing a lot of excursion with no audible benefit. So, there are two bass drivers to fill the bottom end. I'd say that this approach is more hi-fi, and must sound better than those that are crossed higher. The drawback: Reduced max SPL. But, once you start enjoying OB sound, you won't feel an urge to turn the volume knob...
I guess that Nelson thought this way while listening and drinking a glass of wine...
Please correct me if I am wrong....
Regards,
Vix
I was surprised because I expected something around 100-150Hz for the highpass. (at least)
However, Nelson took a different approach. By crossing so low he actually made the Lowther work almost full-range. 60Hz might be the point where it short-cuts, so anyway it wouldn't be making much below that. High-pass seems to be there just to relieve the Lowther of doing a lot of excursion with no audible benefit. So, there are two bass drivers to fill the bottom end. I'd say that this approach is more hi-fi, and must sound better than those that are crossed higher. The drawback: Reduced max SPL. But, once you start enjoying OB sound, you won't feel an urge to turn the volume knob...
I guess that Nelson thought this way while listening and drinking a glass of wine...
Please correct me if I am wrong....
Regards,
Vix
Lynn's perspective on this matter:
extracted from post, I trust is this not taken out of context:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1326301#post1326301
didn't like the First Watt crossover at 75 Hz at all. As MJK's paper makes clear, an 8" driver in a fairly narrow baffle needs a fairly high crossover, maybe around 200~250 Hz, and it is asking very little of open-baffle woofers to be flat up to 250 Hz, epecially a pair of little bitty 10" audiophile woofers with fancy phase plugs.
What makes the higher crossover a matter of necessity rather than choice is the extremely small Xmax of the Lowther, no greater than the Xmax of a good 1" dome tweeter. By crossing the Lowther at 75 Hz a lot of distortion is assured at almost any playing level, and that's what I heard - the onset of harshness was pretty rapid with increased level, and was to some extent noticeable with all program material.
Moving two octaves higher would have cleaned up things a lot - and if woofer coloration is noticeable at 300 Hz, well, that says something about the choice of woofers, doesn't it? Any decent woofer short of an 18" subwoofer should handle 300 Hz with grace and ease.
extracted from post, I trust is this not taken out of context:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1326301#post1326301
Hi all,
Jon Ver Halen tells me that the 15 ohm PM6A actually has 3mm of xmax. I suspect Nelson was taking advantage of this, as the 8 ohm model has only 1mm.
For that reason I now have a pair of 15 ohm PM6A's and am going to build the ugliest speaker in the world. Omni Lowther, OB Eminenece Beta 8 , Tang Band W8 740 C for the transmission line. Beta 8 to run without low pass and the crossover point to Lowther TBD. Tang band driven with a plate amp.
All EnABL'd, of course.
Bud
Jon Ver Halen tells me that the 15 ohm PM6A actually has 3mm of xmax. I suspect Nelson was taking advantage of this, as the 8 ohm model has only 1mm.
For that reason I now have a pair of 15 ohm PM6A's and am going to build the ugliest speaker in the world. Omni Lowther, OB Eminenece Beta 8 , Tang Band W8 740 C for the transmission line. Beta 8 to run without low pass and the crossover point to Lowther TBD. Tang band driven with a plate amp.
All EnABL'd, of course.
Bud
BudP said:Hi all,
Jon Ver Halen tells me that the 15 ohm PM6A actually has 3mm of xmax. I suspect Nelson was taking advantage of this, as the 8 ohm model has only 1mm.
For that reason I now have a pair of 15 ohm PM6A's and am going to build the ugliest *speaker in the world. Omni Lowther, OB Eminenece Beta 8 , Tang Band W8 740 C for the transmission line. Beta 8 to run without low pass and the crossover point to Lowther TBD. Tang band driven with a plate amp.
All EnABL'd, of course.
Bud
I dunno Bud, I think WA has that* sewn up
BudP said:Tang Band W8 740 C
Fun little woofers aren't they? I am quite happy with mine.
Attachments
chrismercurio
My wife is CEO of our transformer company and is willing to put up with R&D insults in the living room/audio test center. Her comment lead me to believe that they were actually uglier than I thought. I just claim it is a Bauhaus based design so form follows function, offer to show the simulations and she just walks away shaking her head.
Cal
I am still awaiting the Tang Band drivers so I haven't any experience, so I am glad to hear you are happy with them.
Bud
My wife is CEO of our transformer company and is willing to put up with R&D insults in the living room/audio test center. Her comment lead me to believe that they were actually uglier than I thought. I just claim it is a Bauhaus based design so form follows function, offer to show the simulations and she just walks away shaking her head.
Cal
I am still awaiting the Tang Band drivers so I haven't any experience, so I am glad to hear you are happy with them.
Bud
Re: That looks like a
I thought this was proceedings for divorce. But NOOAAOO! I guess I'm gonna have to try harder next time
That's an interesting drawing Dave.
chrismercurio said:technical illustration of a divorce....
C
I thought this was proceedings for divorce. But NOOAAOO! I guess I'm gonna have to try harder next time
That's an interesting drawing Dave.
Attachments
I was sitting right beside Lynn Olson for the demo. I've posted my thoughts on the EnABL Thread. (post #768)
Lynn has much more sophisticated hearing than I, so take my report with a grain of salt, but it's what I heard.
Thanks Jon Ver Halen for running the demo. Great sounding rig, either way.
Lynn has much more sophisticated hearing than I, so take my report with a grain of salt, but it's what I heard.
Thanks Jon Ver Halen for running the demo. Great sounding rig, either way.
I know, I know,
the divorce comment was a little harsh.
Honestly I could get away with a lot more strewn about the living room before we were married. Now with a little one, all kinds of stuff is strewn everywhere, it's just not mine!
My test baffle with the ti-100 and PR170mo mounted to it got some interesting comments from the wife when she came home from yoga...if I had a digital camera I would post pix. Picture a 17"w x 48" h .75" piece of mdf with that cute little visaton and the audax on opposite sides and the whole thing propped up with Bessey clamps. Not exactly d-i-v-o-r-c-e but more like, wtf is in MY living room?
C
the divorce comment was a little harsh.
Honestly I could get away with a lot more strewn about the living room before we were married. Now with a little one, all kinds of stuff is strewn everywhere, it's just not mine!
My test baffle with the ti-100 and PR170mo mounted to it got some interesting comments from the wife when she came home from yoga...if I had a digital camera I would post pix. Picture a 17"w x 48" h .75" piece of mdf with that cute little visaton and the audax on opposite sides and the whole thing propped up with Bessey clamps. Not exactly d-i-v-o-r-c-e but more like, wtf is in MY living room?
C
cyclotronguy said:Well, With Nelson it's all about the electronics.... it's a talent.
Cyclotronguy.
Just a talent? Too modest . . .
Much much greater!
Studley said:The usual counter argument to using active Xovers is that the advantages are outweighed by the disadvantages of putting more circuitry in the signal path.
Would you care to comment on your new "special" Xover in this context?
That is the counter-argument. In the end, you try things and see
what works out best. Trying to get this result passively is
cumbersome and requires a lot more power amplifier, and so
was an easy decision.
Re: Favorite Stories
What I enjoyed about this system is that we broke as many rules
as possible:
"You can't drive Lowthers with solid state"
"You can't get low end out of open baffles"
"You can't get low end out of such tiny open baffles"
"You can't get good sound out of MDF baffles"
"You can't get good sound out of baffles that vibrate like crazy"
"You can't use a speaker in the middle of the baffle"
"You can't cross a Lowther at that frequency"
"You can't cross a Lowther at that slope, either"
"You can't drive a Lowther that hard."
(repeat previous three, substituting "SEAS" for "Lowther")
"You're joking using those Kimber pythons for speaker cable"
"You can't be serious using a Sony player"
and finally:
"That can't be a steam locomotive coming through the wall!"
Jon Ver Halen said:None of these quotes are totally accurate, but are meant to give the gist of the conversation:
Visitor "You cannot hook Lowthers up to solid state amps"
Nelson "And when was that law passed?"
(etc.)
What I enjoyed about this system is that we broke as many rules
as possible:
"You can't drive Lowthers with solid state"
"You can't get low end out of open baffles"
"You can't get low end out of such tiny open baffles"
"You can't get good sound out of MDF baffles"
"You can't get good sound out of baffles that vibrate like crazy"
"You can't use a speaker in the middle of the baffle"
"You can't cross a Lowther at that frequency"
"You can't cross a Lowther at that slope, either"
"You can't drive a Lowther that hard."
(repeat previous three, substituting "SEAS" for "Lowther")
"You're joking using those Kimber pythons for speaker cable"
"You can't be serious using a Sony player"
and finally:
"That can't be a steam locomotive coming through the wall!"
dw8083 said:I believe the cost of the Lowthers are about $2500 per pair
The special PM6A's with 16 ohm, silver and Ticonal are about $1500
a pair, I believe, and the others are in the $1100 region.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Rmaf 07