What do you mean by 'transfers'?SO which transfers better, voltage or current ? tubes or SS ?........
SO which transfers better, voltage or current ? tubes or SS ?........
Conductivity, obviously!
I wasn't aware that it had been already answered. In my case, it was not a matter of ignoring the facts, rather not fully understanding.
Could you quote the contributor please?
The possibility of the clear facts being ignored seems very possible and I am not accusing anyone here specifically, its just that conversation and discussion is, in and of itself, a difficult discipline indeed.
Agree, about the ... "several page explanation of the 'it depends' factors?"
I second Janneman. For those who knows and has a real experience "it depends" is a well known fact. And the fact that explanation of what it depends on requires many pages of books, articles, discussions.
There is actually a plethora of such individuals here. A few of them don't act like children either.
Originally Posted by philmagnotta
PSW Recording Forums is certainly the place to bring this subject up as there are a large number of internationally respected designers, recordists, producers, etc.
Perhaps, if no one is able to conclude this topic, it would be interesting to take the thoughts expressed here and post it over there.
I fully agree regarding the many talented folks here. I've stated this many times.
It's just that the folks over at PSW generally are involved in a different field even though it actually all comes down to same thing.
PSW Recording Forums is certainly the place to bring this subject up as there are a large number of internationally respected designers, recordists, producers, etc.
Perhaps, if no one is able to conclude this topic, it would be interesting to take the thoughts expressed here and post it over there.
There is actually a plethora of such individuals here. A few of them don't act like children either.
I fully agree regarding the many talented folks here. I've stated this many times.
It's just that the folks over at PSW generally are involved in a different field even though it actually all comes down to same thing.
I thought that post # 206 gave a clear account. But I understand the problem of picking out the sensible stuff from several conflicting statements. It's a classic chicken-or-egg problem: you have to have some knowledge about the subject to be able to judge the answers. I'm not saying you don't have it, more as a general observation.
jd
Thanks. I'll have a look at #206 and run it by some of the folks at PSW.
Agree about the remainder of you reply, although as stated earlier, there is a lot to be said, therefore even the experts will disagree from time to time.
Not about the basic things discussed here. But, unlike 'Ph.D', 'expert' is not a protected title. Anybody can call himself an expert on anything. Further muddying the waters
There's no way around educating yourself, in the end.
jd
Not about the basic things discussed here. But, unlike 'Ph.D', 'expert' is not a protected title. Anybody can call himself an expert on anything. Further muddying the waters
There's no way around educating yourself, in the end.
jd
Very, very true.
If the 'expert' has an agenda, that can further muddy the waters. In the end, FWIW I recommend an empirical approach.Not about the basic things discussed here. But, unlike 'Ph.D', 'expert' is not a protected title. Anybody can call himself an expert on anything. Further muddying the waters
There's no way around educating yourself, in the end.
jd
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.