If you look at the sticky "pictures of your pass amps" you can see a pic of the B-1, and I think the F-5. Westend cut the metal for both. Very reasonable. See post #174Thanks for the responses. Russell I will have to check out those enclosures when you get them.
James
Russellc
Last edited:
Russell,
I have seen those and they are very nice. That is why I was wondering where yours would come from
Makes my little B1 look shabby.
James
Contact Westend for more info, he's quite easy to work with.
Russellc
ZVP2110 will work fine. LED is just a reference of about 1.8 Volts.
LTL-1CHE Fairchild is what I used.
Thanks Wayne I will also use 2SK170 instead of 370
Currently "thinling" on the boards. I think I'll end up doing the double sided thing by myself but will respect exact component spacing, placing and ground planes.
Best regards,
n A r
Maybe because Nelson didn't finish the Pearl II paper yet
I work almost every day on the project. I just took the liberty of adapting the original .pdf to real board size, then from now I'm working on 3 real layers in Photoshop-CS : serigraph, components side and soldering side. The result will be as close as the Pearl II original boards, with same drawing and ground planes. As I don't plan to go for metallized holes, I will have to solder-through at some spots, but nothing undo able
Question is, I still don't know if the original boards have a second ground plane on the soldering side. I guess there is
I'll just mod the soldering platforms for input/output sections , because I will use some special minimalistic cabling with "no wire" into the unit. For audio paths to and from the RCAs, I will use special silver ribbon/teflon solution, directly derived from the nAr-cable research and Allen thoughts (thanks again for opening my mind). I will also try to use the best low-mass RCAs, the bullet ones, chassis-female and cable-male. The boards will be tightened on nylon holders with plastic screw instead of metal, and little rubber torque against solid vibrations transmission. Housing will be plain aluminium for best grounding and no magnetic interactions. R-core 24V 300VA with dual mono power, rectifiers and 1st reservoir will be in separate housing
And yes, I will want my sticker
Best regards,
nAr
I work almost every day on the project. I just took the liberty of adapting the original .pdf to real board size, then from now I'm working on 3 real layers in Photoshop-CS : serigraph, components side and soldering side. The result will be as close as the Pearl II original boards, with same drawing and ground planes. As I don't plan to go for metallized holes, I will have to solder-through at some spots, but nothing undo able
Question is, I still don't know if the original boards have a second ground plane on the soldering side. I guess there is
I'll just mod the soldering platforms for input/output sections , because I will use some special minimalistic cabling with "no wire" into the unit. For audio paths to and from the RCAs, I will use special silver ribbon/teflon solution, directly derived from the nAr-cable research and Allen thoughts (thanks again for opening my mind). I will also try to use the best low-mass RCAs, the bullet ones, chassis-female and cable-male. The boards will be tightened on nylon holders with plastic screw instead of metal, and little rubber torque against solid vibrations transmission. Housing will be plain aluminium for best grounding and no magnetic interactions. R-core 24V 300VA with dual mono power, rectifiers and 1st reservoir will be in separate housing
And yes, I will want my sticker
Best regards,
nAr
Awesome. I've not had a chance to work much on it at all. I need to get back to it soon.Maybe because Nelson didn't finish the Pearl II paper yet
I work almost every day on the project.
Indeed they do. Full ground fill around the trace routing. Same gap observed between PS & Circuit ground.Question is, I still don't know if the original boards have a second ground plane on the soldering side. I guess there is
I'm planning a little less of a specialty build. Aluminum case, aluminum standoffs, "standard" I/O jacks and such. Definitely mounting the transformer, rectifiers, and first filter cap outboard though. (my current phono, just the transformer is remote, which also seems to work well enough) the challenge now is for me to find some casework that's not too big...
Since it will be remote, I'll likely use whatever E-I core I can dig up. (hard to find R-cores around here) I may have a toroid handy, but that's OK, I also have line filters
best of luck!
I'm at the coast, wrapping the article up.
Best news I've had all week!
russellc
Best news I've had all week!
russellc
That is indeed good news
I have been playing and ripping LPs from my AlephOno clone for some years. However, I feel like that design, which is close to Ono, is simpler and having the 4 x 2SK370 at the input will probably achieve better sounding and higher gain than directly going onto the original 2SK389 ( plus the feedback for the RIAA correction that differs ).
Today, I understand the importance of components placing and proper ground planes, with no loops of course
Silk layer done, components layer done, components routing on the solder side done, I'm currently finishing the ground planes. Every layer is conveniently saved as .psd for my daily work. The finished work will be exported directly into .pdf, so I can conveniently print on transparent before boards exposition and etching
Best,
nAr
It's back in Wayne's hands now.
Very good news indeed
From my side, my double-sided board "reverse-engineering" project is finished.
May I post gifs of the board, the 2 sides, for pcb review ?
I just would like to be sure that there are no design flaws other than routing errors (e.g., ground planes, if I can learn more about pcb design, well I'm humble, every expert advice is welcome )
Best,
nAr
Last edited:
From my side, my double-sided board "reverse-engineering" project is finished.
May I post gifs of the board, the 2 sides, for pcb review ?
nAr
Sorry to bump into the thread once more, but I really didn't intend to hijack this thread - untitled Pearl 2, so it's really for the PASS boards of the Pearl and all aspects of the realisation we deal here. Like, substitutes for semi-conductors, ground wiring schemes, choice of resistors and capacitors in series with signal, problems once done and fired up, etc.
I however felt not every one could deal with the 200 bucks and would be tempted do do their own. That was my will, and I am almost done with the project. As I said, I really think layout and PCB has a sonic importance, mostly for noise issues but not only. I won't post anything here until Wayne or Nelson say OK to it. As I said, I don't want to hijack the thread.
I also want to thank eclectik2k for reviewing my big boards mistakes as I made some HUGE ones ! But that's how I learn, personally
I am just sad that this wonderful RIAA stage doesn't interest more people than this.
I mean, LPs are so friendly to music They really deserve their first class RIAA
And yes, I have a Massive Attack album that is divided into 3 LPs ... but ... you have to play the disc at 45 RPM to get the good music funny, isn't it ? It sounds better at 45 RPM than 33 ... treble are better defined and refined
Best regards,
nAr
Last edited:
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Pearl Two