Pass Labs B4 crossover questions

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
B4-Inside.jpg


Clearly seen here.
 
I guess the SK vs LK links work like this: In the LK (Linkwitz) position you cross at e.g. 2200 Hz and with both HP and LP 6 dB down. In the SK (Sallen-Key) position you keep the HP as is, while the LP is changed so it falls off at an increased frequency, namely such that it crosses the HP at 3200 Hz, where both HP and LP are 3 db down.
I tried a LTSpice simulation varying the resistors by the .step function, and got LP and HP curves all over my screen! I choose semi-arbitrary values for the resistors, starting at 2.34375k stepping with that number up to ~300k.
Very nice crossover, NP! :cheers:

/RK
 
The one and only
Joined 2001
Paid Member
Thank you.

I put SK and LK on the board screening because they were the "obvious"
values that people want.

In point of fact they are rarely the optimal settings, as they don't account
for driver phase and amplitude response.

Siegfried historically dealt with this by creating additional eq and phase
correction for drivers so that they would work with the crossovers, a
case of deconstruction and synthesis.

The alternative I usually employ is to fool around with the pole values
of the filter until they give me what I want. Routinely this can achieve
a similar result, it's advantage being that the circuit is simpler.
 
Thank you.

I put SK and LK on the board screening because they were the "obvious"
values that people want.

In point of fact they are rarely the optimal settings, as they don't account
for driver phase and amplitude response.

Siegfried historically dealt with this by creating additional eq and phase
correction for drivers so that they would work with the crossovers, a
case of deconstruction and synthesis.

The alternative I usually employ is to fool around with the pole values
of the filter until they give me what I want. Routinely this can achieve
a similar result, it's advantage being that the circuit is simpler.


You're welcome.
I imagined the concept as in the attached drawing.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_8197.jpg
    IMG_8197.jpg
    498.1 KB · Views: 344
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.