As I said, if you're using a fet or bjt anywhere in your amp, simply use a cap output and accept that you're building a solid state amp. Look at attached picture for a most simple (if probably not the best) topology. Adding tubes or transformers will just add cruft and not help... is a fet source follower not a tube. Hence the possibility of 1 ohm Zout (in simple source follower or if not some other SS buffer), hence the idea to begin with.
A bjt will work better with less voltage across, so can be more efficient and sonically better with the low voltages required by (low impedance) headphones.Another side question is: given a tube gain stage, would there be any advantage to using an emitter follower rather than a source follower in a similar circuit for this application?
Attachments
As I said, if you're using a fet or bjt anywhere in your amp, simply use a cap output and accept that you're building a solid state amp. Look at attached picture for a most simple (if probably not the best) topology. Adding tubes or transformers will just add cruft and not help.
A bjt will work better with less voltage across, so can be more efficient and sonically better with the low voltages required by (low impedance) headphones.
Thanks for the circuit.
I ran across this buffer intended for speaker amp, assume it could be scaled down. Probably overkill was interested in how low the Zout is.
"Bandwidth (-3dB) is from 4Hz to 250kHz. Rise time is 1.5µs. Output resistance 0.16 Ohm. The circuit is very tolerant of different kinds of load. Input resistance is 10 kOhm (R0), but can be increased up to 100 kOhm (R4) by omitting R0. Input capacitance remains relatively high, about 1500pF."
Project 83 - MOSFET Power Follower
Your advice re tubes and transformers is duly noted but im planning to proceed with this. Feel free to roll your eyes and shake your head.
I will of course listen to it without the "cruft" along the way.
I did what I should have done to begin with, which is to email Kevin Carter the Lundahl transformer importer. His response was that this will work as I thought! He recommended the following gapped Lundahls.
"Lundahl LL2731 or for lower primary resistance the LL2754"
Though I would like to find something less expensive for initial proof of concept.
Last edited:
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.