Opamp low-pass roll-off question

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
I see now that there seems to be some automatic
function compressing spaces, so all the equations I tried to
make look nice turned out entirely wrong. Yet another reason
to hate all Microsoftish software. Hope you can make sense
out of it anyway, putting the numerators and denominators
back into their proper place.
 
Take a snapshot

Christer said:
I see now that there seems to be some automatic
function compressing spaces, so all the equations I tried to
make look nice turned out entirely wrong. Yet another reason
to hate all Microsoftish software. Hope you can make sense
out of it anyway, putting the numerators and denominators
back into their proper place.
You can write down the fourmulas in an text editor.
Than capture the window of the editor.
I use XnView freeware - it can capture in tree ways:
desktop, window, work space in a window

I usually save the capture in "Xxxxxxx.gif"
but the default is something "Capture.92i"

Then you attach your image to your post.
 
This is a cut out

This is a cut out from a capture.92i
and saved in xxxx.png - It is only 10.08 Kb
a format that someones think is the future. Portable Networks Graphics
We have to consult our "Video" department to get some serious information
 

Attachments

  • xxxx1.png
    xxxx1.png
    10.1 KB · Views: 104
Halojoy,

yes, I was considering posting it as a picture, but I decided to
make the whole text a zip file instead.

The text of my previous posting is attached as a pure text file
so it can be viewed by any program with normal behaviour.
You may have to specify a fixed-width font, though, to make
it appear as intended. I really should typeset it in LaTex to
make it nice, but I am not sure the text is of that much use to
anyone that it is worth it.
 

Attachments

  • diyaudio.txt
    5.4 KB · Views: 44
Re: Re: Re: Re: What is the fault in my Calculator?

UrSv said:


And -j of course which squared gives -1. Or i and -i as in maths as I think j is used for physics/electronics mainly. Confusing to say the least. It does exist however.

The solution to SQRT(-1) is thus j and -j.

/UrSv

Ahhhh, you are quite right! Both j and -j squared equil -1... ...Slipped my mind!

Hear that Jan? There are two numbers you can square to get -1 :)

traderbam: Good show! Exactly what I was thinking, but was way too lazy to type out!

-Dan
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.