Exactly. On the right channel (L-Pad side) changing the cap and coil to at around 3.9uF + 0.44mH sounds very similar like the left channel (series single resistor) where the values are 4.7uF+0.26mH.
The sound it is a matter of taste I think. With the single resistor it is calmer, smoother top end and warmer the speaker globally. The L-Pad version with the new values also very good. It is natural sounding, probably has a bit more dynamic and extended frequency response of course. The upper treble is stronger. Both are very good I think, difficult to decide. They have different tonality for sure. I will listen the L-Pad version for a while.
The sound it is a matter of taste I think. With the single resistor it is calmer, smoother top end and warmer the speaker globally. The L-Pad version with the new values also very good. It is natural sounding, probably has a bit more dynamic and extended frequency response of course. The upper treble is stronger. Both are very good I think, difficult to decide. They have different tonality for sure. I will listen the L-Pad version for a while.
Yes, the L-pad version is the latest. I like it.
We forgot to examine the 3rd option...
What happens if the single series resistor is between the high-pass?
I mean first the series cap, after the series single resistor and lastly the parallel coil. Probably the sound would be similar to where the single series resistor is before the high-pass? This is another story...
We forgot to examine the 3rd option...
What happens if the single series resistor is between the high-pass?
I mean first the series cap, after the series single resistor and lastly the parallel coil. Probably the sound would be similar to where the single series resistor is before the high-pass? This is another story...
Which has a happy ending!
The single series resistor may be placed before or after the capacitor to equal effect.
(Just don't place it after the inductor.)
I meant, if placed after the inductor, different L/C values would be required.
Better if I hadn't added that, as it wasn't pertinent to the question asked.
It's ok, we're just chatting now.
If that was the point then I'd have been pushing for a simulation. As far as I have been concerned it has been all about chance.
Lol. Each iteration is a chance, with a bonus of increased knowledge of the situation.
Code:
KIRK: Mister Spock, can we get those two guards? What would you say the odds on our getting out of here?
SPOCK: Difficult to be precise, Captain. I should say approximately 7,824.7 to 1.
KIRK: Difficult to be precise? 7,824 to 1?
SPOCK: 7,824.7 to 1.
KIRK: That's a pretty close approximation.
SPOCK: I endeavour to be accurate.
KIRK: You do quite well. Set your phaser on stun.