The "bad/irregular" ones. After sizing, cleaning, aligning and stabilizing them of course.
The Bybee Quantum Mechanical Filter that was developed from this research is a device that creates a barrier and literally sizes, cleans, aligns and stabilizes individual electrons and throws out the bad/irregular electrons.
se
Pavel,
I think Telefunken found a better way to make electrons behave....
YouTube - historic Telefunken commercial
I didn't know that there was a rivalry between tube generations, but then again, I guess each new generation despises the previous one....
Howard Hoyt
CE - WXYC FM 89.3
UNC Chapel Hill
www.wxyc.org
1st on the Internet
Isn't it wonderful (and a gift to the ad men) that metals with magic properties also have such wonderful names? With names like that they must have counter-intuitive properties!
No, these are the ones we want. It was always a mistake to do electronics with electrons because, as fermions, they don't like each other so any current becomes lumpy and noisy. Better to use bosons, as they always play nicely together so we would get nice smooth signals. We just need a stable charged boson. Any ideas? I know, alpha particles!
"Stupidity is far more dangerous than evil, for evil takes a break from time to time, stupidity does not." — Anatole France
I see no one wants to take a break on beating up on Bybee
At least we've taken a break from op-amp rolling.
I will leave SY to explain to people with golden ears how solitons, a non-linear phenomenon, will enhance their listening experience. Or maybe that is how SE works - the non-linearity in the output stage launches solitonic audio through the speaker so the sound propagates undisturbed to their ears.
I have in front of me a material which actually does conduct via solitons rather than electrons. P-type, in this particular case, so I guess it would be "solitons rather than holes." I'm afraid to use it in my system lest the lack of spin in the charge carriers cause the music to be reproduced with such stunning rhythm and pace that I succumb to the same fate as the little girl in The Red Shoes.
So I take it that you send your bank info to that nice Nigerian fellow? After all, if you haven't tried, you don't know it's a scam, right?
Before I buy something I either want good reports from people I trust, or a plausible(*) explanation of how it works. When it comes to audio I trust very few people, not because there is anything wrong with them but because I have heard of the placebo effect so I don't fully trust myself. The placebo effect still works even when you know it is working.
Other people may have the advantage of ignorance, or a post-modern mindset. I don't have those advantages.
(*) plausible = accords with the physics I know, or a reasonable extension of it
Other people may have the advantage of ignorance, or a post-modern mindset. I don't have those advantages.
(*) plausible = accords with the physics I know, or a reasonable extension of it
You are on dangerous ground Joshua....SY has made many measurements of these devices and despite his bias against anything with the whiff of snake-oil he has published his results on that thread.....if you search you will find a lot of information [.......maybe this testing is responsible for his late desktop being safe in the arms of......
] Of course anyone could pose the question "was SY, through the fact that he is not familiar with the practice of measuring what some would call magical effects as found outside strict schoolroom science, measuring the correct properties? I'll leave you to decide for yourself, but he has done the work. As for me? I don't care either way as I have plenty of other cures needed before concerning myself with audio magic/jewellery.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.