So, this guy cannot have an opinion on this public forum unless it's backed up by scientific proof? My understanding is that he thinks those devices work and that they're awesome. Why can't you guys agree to disagree?
No need for personal attacks and insults just because someone doesn't subscribe to the same convictions as you.
Don't remember if it was Sy or who it was but if we look back months ago when this came up again it was stated they were tested and disassembled and nothing inside, just a resistor.
Is it any wonder that the high end industry is dying. When the big names will sell useless junk why should anyone pay attention to the industry? It has become a circus of who can sell the most expensive toys that serve no purpose. Magic pills and magic dots to put on your walls. Unbelievable.
Is it any wonder that the high end industry is dying. When the big names will sell useless junk why should anyone pay attention to the industry? It has become a circus of who can sell the most expensive toys that serve no purpose. Magic pills and magic dots to put on your walls. Unbelievable.
Last edited:
I cant see how the ByBee thing can work either... little to no info and I have not tried to listen to them, either..... 
As I understand those poking at JC believe that what he does hurts people, and so feel justified, or even a bit more than justified. I can see why this happens, but I also think it is all a bunch of misdirected energies, and not very productive (whether they are right or not). There are no actual results from this as far as I can tell, except for frustration.
I'm game. It needs a pair of decent toroid cores. I may have something in the junk box. Studying the circuit the part that leaves me lost is the return current from the opamp output. It all goes to the differential inputs which are high impedance when the opamp is working. Is there a cap or some such I'm missing?
Don Moses showed me something similar for AC power many years ago. I could not see a good pathway to a business then for it, too expensive and esoteric for the mid-high market then. The whole mid-high market is gone now.
The toroids are transformers. The authors suggest 12 to 20 turns each for the coax windings, 10 turns for the detector winding, and 50 turns for the correction winding. One transformer senses current at one end of the cable and the other drives the opposite end with an inverse correction current in an attempt to cancel unwanted current flowing from one end to the other. AC current flows into the output transformer. DC current is essentially zero.
I have some thoughts about implementation if helpful but no time to build or test anything.
Dave
Last edited:
Defenitely not! Early during his work Copernicus was actually invited to Rome and his discovery was hailed as a great result from Christian Science. It was much later that his going got tough for political reasons.
Comparing Copernicus to the Bybee stuff is hilarious - Copernicus actually had something to show for.
Jan
I wouldn't buy a Bybee device if it cost $5. But I have no problem if JC pays $300 a piece, or if he thinks it's made of dlithium crystal.
Let's stay away from personal jabs. This forum is a good playground for discussing ideas or building projects. Some are well rooted in science, others have a good amount of personal belief. Neither can be dismissed, no matter how offensive it can be to anyone of us. It's just what it is.
Let's stay away from personal jabs. This forum is a good playground for discussing ideas or building projects. Some are well rooted in science, others have a good amount of personal belief. Neither can be dismissed, no matter how offensive it can be to anyone of us. It's just what it is.
No need to make this political and bring in DC....
- Status
- Not open for further replies.