Must have misunderstood your dimensions. My error, oops.
Maybe you could use a couple of these- Dayton Audio DCS165-4 6-1/2" Classic Subwoofer 4 Ohm
or here is one that looks good and is a clearance buyout special-
HP-6020 6-1/2" Poly Cone Woofer with Rubber Surround 8 Ohm
Use two in your box or even three if your amp will drive it. How about these? It has a rubber surround which means much longer life and the low Q means good and tight. Q is the measure of stored energy with a higher Q meaning more stored energy of which I am not a fan.
Maybe you could use a couple of these- Dayton Audio DCS165-4 6-1/2" Classic Subwoofer 4 Ohm
or here is one that looks good and is a clearance buyout special-
HP-6020 6-1/2" Poly Cone Woofer with Rubber Surround 8 Ohm
Use two in your box or even three if your amp will drive it. How about these? It has a rubber surround which means much longer life and the low Q means good and tight. Q is the measure of stored energy with a higher Q meaning more stored energy of which I am not a fan.
At the dawn of the internet age this is certainly what it meant around here. Not sure when it changed? I've been on the internet since about 1988 - well before the worldwideweb existed. The antonym to IMNSHO or In my not so honest opinion, i.e. reflecting my personal bias.
Hi All,
FYI:Checking Rulo's initial pick of a .1 Driver for Sub use = RCA WF60R:
b
Correction: All Credit should be directed to sreten who suggested the $15.00 6 inch BS28-6P Aluminum Cone 8 Ohm Woofer-Driver for to be used in a 2.1 System.The RCA WF-60R Amplifier mentioned by Rulo would (IMO) provide more Dynamic-headroom than necessary, as only 11 W Rms is needed to reach x-max.
As seen in the second of the submitted Pictures: In case of 2 Drivers if using the same Volume as for one Driver tuned to ~40 Hz:
This configuration returns a more sloping FR that is adequate if the Sub is placed near a Corner, i.e. in PI (Sr) where the Room boundary-Gain would improve the lower cut-off Frequency,too.
b
The RCA WF-60R Amplifier mentioned by Rulo would (IMO) provide more Dynamic-
headroom than necessary, as only 11 W Rms is needed to reach x-max.
b
Hi,
True in a sense. But subwoofers don't only reproduce sine waves.
What about 10W low down and 40W higher up at the same time ?
That can be 50W without exceeding the excursion limits.
Note that for use with the minimus 7's x/o frequency will be high.
rgds, sreten.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.