Jamesblond said:Would it help fitting the PR in the panel opposite the active driver?Or does that cancel it's function?
Should be ok, but make shure box is heavy.
See:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=83922&perpage=25&highlight=&pagenumber=1
edit: Take a look at this XLS10 sub, I like it:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84111
4fun said:
edit: Take a look at this XLS10 sub, I like it:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=84111
Looks cool! But I think it's just a wee bit too big for now... Although i MIGHT be moving to a bigger home within the year, but I don't know yet. I want to be able to place the sub without having to move out my tv and such
Just put them both on different side panels (instead of one on the bottom) if you're concerned about lag.
Not really. Now if you had two active drivers opposite each other, or two PR's opposite each other then they would help cancel out vibrations. But in this case, not so much.Would it help fitting the PR in the panel opposite the active driver?
Edit: In response to Jamesblond,
Compliance is about the same for woofer and PR and moving mass of woofer 135g so sag will be about half and that is probably ok if driver suspension is stable over time.
Maybe other have different opinion but I dislike having drivers with high compliance and high moving mass mounted for downfiring.
Why? If the driver tend to sag more over time cone may have its resting position in an area there spider is stating to be progressive. Result, cone till sense different spring force in each direction of movement. And in addition to PR a driver will have different Xmax in each direction, resulting in unlinearity....distorsion
Of course this is valid if we go to extremes, XLS10 will probably be ok. Other builders may have more hands on experiance of XLS10 than I have.
Compliance is about the same for woofer and PR and moving mass of woofer 135g so sag will be about half and that is probably ok if driver suspension is stable over time.
Maybe other have different opinion but I dislike having drivers with high compliance and high moving mass mounted for downfiring.
Why? If the driver tend to sag more over time cone may have its resting position in an area there spider is stating to be progressive. Result, cone till sense different spring force in each direction of movement. And in addition to PR a driver will have different Xmax in each direction, resulting in unlinearity....distorsion
Of course this is valid if we go to extremes, XLS10 will probably be ok. Other builders may have more hands on experiance of XLS10 than I have.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.