ESP HPA

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Anyone know what is the purpose of C2 at the inverting input of the opamp in this schematic ? C6 is to filter RF frequencies ?

628787d1501815103-esp-hpa-hpa-sch-png
 
Last edited:
I built the Headphone amp on a breadboard. Built with minimal parts from original schematic. I left out alot of capacitors. This is the schematic of what I built on the breadboard.
Rod elliot Headamp.jpg

Added output capacitors as the DC offset was 30mv per channel. Used NE5532 opamp. Listening to it now and amazed that it even works on the breadboard ! It is silent with nothing playing. From initial listening, I can say that it sounds good. Need to listen more before I can describe its sound.

Opamp headamp buffered resize.jpg
 
Been listening to this amp and comparing with Hugh's Class A headphone amp. Both the amps are good but they sound slightly different. Hugh's Class A amp has really clear vocals. The vocals are much smoother and sweeter on Hugh's class A amp than the esp HPA.

The esp HPA seems to have slightly better separation in instruments. This amp also has a slightly bigger soundstage. Like when I was listening to Twenty one pilots - Chlorine, the drum playing on the left at the start of the song seems further. The drums feel more realistic with Hugh's Class A amp though. Now I can't tell which amp is better. They are both different. Some songs sound better on esp HPA and some better on Hugh's Class A amp.
 
I have a 1000uF output coupling capacitor for the esp HPA to protect against DC. When I used 0.1uF film bypass capacitor on the 1000uF output cap the soundstage seems slightly larger and the guitar strings in some songs feels more real. It feels like the strings have longer decay. I am not sure if I am imagining it. Can using bypass capacitor have such an effect ? The headphones I use are 32ohm.
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
Matching FETs is not critical, just pick two consecutive FETs from a tape roll. Regarding Hugh’s amp - that is his most basic one. He has better ones including my pocket Class A (PCA). Performance of my PCA easily beats the BD140 based one, and probably the ESP if using higher impedance headphones. The BF862 JFET is perhaps one of the best input stage devices - ultra low noise and very linear and sensitive. The output is a MOSFET so has lower impedance than the BJT for deeper and more powerful bass.

For 32ohm headphones, use 2200uF caps. Bypass film caps are a good idea and even 2.2uF ones like MKS are good. With PCA, if phones are very sensitive (100dB+) it can work, else might cause higher distortion.
 
Last edited:
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
It’s a subjective area - value and type of bypass cap can change perception of sound quality.

Try metal foil in oil for example. Larger value will have impact down to mid range etc. smaller vale for treble etc. silver will be brighter, paper will have a warmer sound.

A very good bypass is a cheap silk electrolytic - Elna Silmic II 10uF 35v ($0.35 ea) does wonders to the sound quality if you like a smooth sound with clear vocals.

It’s an area of user adjustable tweaking and listening fun. Try DC coupling (no caps) to listen to “baseline” case. Compare to that. If you build actual PCB circuit, it is pretty safe against DC from killing your phones. For short period after successful startup transient gone you can connect DC coupling and listen.
 
Initially I was using a 12V DC Wall wart using a simple voltage divider to get +6V and -6V to power the amp. Bias was at 2.5mA. In theory, should I hear a difference if I used +9V and -9V for the rails of the amp ? Keeping bias constant at 2.5mA by changing resistors.
 
A voltage divider won’t give you enough current for good bass. What’s the value of the resistors on the divider? The two 9v batteries should be better but this circuit was designed for +/-15v and the bias setpoints will be off of voltage too low.

This is the type of voltage divider I used to split the 12V DC to +6V and -6V. Resistors were 4.7kohm and 1000uF caps. Does this mean my output impedance will be 4.7kohm for the supply ? Yes I change bias resistors to provide 2.5mA. Now I am searching my house for a 18V wall wart. Not sure if using two 9v wall wart to provide +9 and -9V will work.

rdiv.png


I have so many things to experiment on this amp since its still on breadboard. Like adding cap across the biasing diodes (which I left out) to see what effect it has.
 
Last edited:
Tested the amp again with +9 and -9V power with the voltage divider split supply. The most immediate change was that the background in the music feels much darker with the higher rails.

On some songs, it feels like there is slightly more space between instruments. But this difference is subtle.
 
Founder of XSA-Labs
Joined 2012
Paid Member
This is the type of voltage divider I used to split the 12V DC to +6V and -6V. Resistors were 4.7kohm and 1000uF caps. Does this mean my output impedance will be 4.7kohm for the supply ? Yes I change bias resistors to provide 2.5mA. Now I am searching my house for a 18V wall wart. Not sure if using two 9v wall wart to provide +9 and -9V will work.

rdiv.png


I have so many things to experiment on this amp since its still on breadboard. Like adding cap across the biasing diodes (which I left out) to see what effect it has.

The headphone output is relative to the virtual ground - so that has to go through 4k7. However, the bulk caps do provide some storage for large current transients. It works but you will get much more powerful bass with a true double rail power supply.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.