DSP Xover project (part 2)

You don't have any gain in here. Even without bass/treble function enabled it could cause clipping on some material. You need to at least compensate for bass/treble headroom and another for sum channel. So add -6 gain for left/right inputs and -12 for sum input. If this will not help deduct another 1 or 2.
I'm actually not using sum, you can also start with additional only -6 sum but not sure if this will help.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
I had -6.
Played CDs, streaming flacs from laptop, then streaming via Volumio / RPi / Kali -> I2S. All absolutely fine.

Then I came across this track on Spotify..
https://spotify.link/NhyKMlO43Cb

Got clipping! Needed another dB or so less!

Not sure if it's still like that or Spotify fixed it. Not played it in ages.
Sure is spooky though!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
And this is perfectly fine, this is how it works.
It's not Spotifys fault it's digital processing. They probably normalized tracks so in result those tracks contains signal levels close to max or even max. If you would disable bass/treble then even with those filters you have you would need at least -1 or more to compensate for filters "ringing". With bass/treble you need additional -6 for left/right input. And then I'm not sure if -6 or -12 for sum channel.
 
I appreciate You help and concerns. Now I've entered -24 dB gain for the "Input Processing", 6 dB headroom for the bass/treble setting and -12 dB pre- together with +6 dB post-gain in the "Channel Processing". Still the RED bass/treble clipping warning led flashes. If I disable the bass/treble control it becomes manageble. I believe the old Apple TV outputs some strange stream... (Excuse my irregular postings. In the middle of a time consuming software project)
 
disabled bass/treble

Hmm, I tried to enable bass/treble and it blinks B/T clip every time. There is some fuzzy description of this somewhere in this thread but I don't get it.
Probably you could put yourself some shelf filter in one of the presets to emulate it and then gain structure wiill be clear. Maybe it's less convenient but it will work.

Why you defined that post and pre-gain all together? Just using -4 pre gain on all inputs or channels does not work?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
using -4 pre gain
(I only occasionally have time tinkering. Please don't think of me as rude for not being able to respond in a timely manner. I really enjoy this discussion.) My reasoning: For the high pass Bessel I need -9 dB pre-gain to avoid clipping, empirically. On the low pass -6 is enough. I thought this clipping occurs inside the mathematics of the digital filter and that the post gain can be used to restore signal levels. My stereo horns and their amp has a different gain than the closed cabinet sub together with the 405 driving it. I still need to lessen the sub a dB or so to make it level. One issue being I often listen at low levels where a "loudness" effect in the bass register would be nice.
 
My reasoning: For the high pass Bessel I need -9 dB pre-gain to avoid clipping, empirically.
I recreated your settings and on white noise 0dba and close to that loud real music file and did not noticed the clipping for -4db gain. Of course it's not extensive testing.
In my setups where I use really steepest LR -48 slopes I use only -6dba gain on inputs and never had any clipping (except for AD clipping when connected to turntable on some strange records but this is completely different topic).
I use more negative gainly only when adding some PEQ or Shelving corrections mostly in manner -6 and max value from peq or shelve correction. I don't use post + gain, probably there are some cases when it could be useful but I can think of none in my usage.

So I would guess then you need -9 when you use +5 on post gain, but without post gain probably it would work on values closer to 0.

I don't even remember if this -6 picked because it was necessary or just because it's voltage/2 and maybe for some unification on different presets.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
(Just a heads up) I'm grateful for all help. My Najda is on the workbench getting a new case with help from a friend. Hence I can't work on the filters at present. I also bought and received a Volumio Rivo as a signal source. My cd player was giving me problems and I wanted to modernize. I'm already deeply impressed by the Rivo. Took some learning never having tinkered with streaming or a digital music library before
 
Gentlemen,

I could use some advice with a Najda combo I'm playing with now. It's a complete v.1.3 set installed on a wooden board, so I'm exploring the options before setting up a proper case for it.

I'm planning to add a USB/I2S XMOS input module from JLSounds, but I cannot find any info on input routing in Nick's manuals. As long as such a board is installed, do you get a new input automatically in the menu (in addition to existing Coax/Optical/Analogue), or does it replace some of the existing inputs?

If it does replace the SPDIF, then the whole board will be of not much use in my case. Half of my listening is vinyl/R2R, but the built-in ADC for the analogue input is pathetic - so an external ADC feeding the coax input is a must. I'm running it now with a Fostex DAT serving as a converter, and the result is way superior to the Najda's ADC.

Thanks a lot in advance:

Boris
 
@Piisami - thank you, I have a friend who is much more knowlegeable than me to help, so we'll figure it out. The transformer on the board has a couple of unused outputs, so we'll probably use these, along with a separate PSB.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5316.JPG
    IMG_5316.JPG
    458.4 KB · Views: 63
OK, please find some photos of my application here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1lq0ZRFTqT0C7eMOK96PIoO2HdfUwkWtb?usp=sharing
Note that my JLSounds board is V II and not the latesst v III
Also I have 2 separate power supply to JLSound board , around 100mA to Header H3 pin 17 and around 400mA to Header H1 pin 1

See below image for the latest JLSounds board:
Also keep in mind to use as short I2S lines as possible and twist each line together with ground, see below image

1705146344971.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Hello,

I think I’d need some more advice on two problems with my Najda.

I got it back from my friend, neatly rearranged on a new board and with the JLSounds XMOS module installed. It played nice, although a bit colourful in the highs — but I attributed that to all the interconnect and power cable upgrades I did in the meantime.

But when I played a test sweep tone 20-20000 from REW, there were very strange artifacts in the higher tones, from approximately 10 KHz and above — like howling wind, or repetitive echo.

Played test tone again via SPDIF — same thing. Disconnected the bridge which tells Najda that XMOS is present — just a tad better. Only when I disconnected all cables from the XMOS and left only the SPDIF, the artifacts disappeared and everything was back in order. Here are two videos, with the test tone via I2S and SPDIF: https://we.tl/t-N2NWUYoI2M

Could anyone give a clue where the mistake could be? I suppose it has to do with the clocks of the Najda and the XMOS messing up, but have no idea what to change.

In Piisami's diagram the connections start from pins 10/11 on the XMOS, but on the JLSounds' website the diagram shows the same outputs on pins 12/13, and it is wired according to that. My friend has installed dozens of these modules, I already use three of them as standalone converters or as part of a DAC, but it's the first time we see something similar.

The second problem is the analogue volume encoder. The front panel has the module installed, but it simply does not do anything. I tried connecting the cable to the pins 12 and 14 both ways, to no avail (NB - in the picture it’s disconnected, I know). Am I missing something here?

Thanks a ton in advance for any ideas!

IMG_5566.jpg


IMG_5567.jpg

IMG_5568.jpg

Screenshot 2024-01-28 at 14.34.29.png

IMG_5571.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-01-28 at 14.34.29.png
    Screenshot 2024-01-28 at 14.34.29.png
    93.3 KB · Views: 27