Schematics and parts list are attached. More details can be found in an earlier thread.
Attachments
The PCB is 8x10cm, double-sided, solder mask over silver-plated copper (manufactured by Custom PCB). Soldering was done by hand. (I actually find surface mount components faster and easier to work with than through-hole. Less operations involved - no forming the leads and nipping them - just place and solder.)
About the sound:
I did a bit of listening (running from battery power) of different sources - 44.1kHz CD, 48kHz DVD, 24/96kHz DVD Audio. Overall first impression is quite good. Noise floor is very low and sounds white. In the quiteness, small details come through, and the dynamics is striking. Stereo imaging is good and effortless. Sibilance is controlled. I think I like this DAC better than PCM1730 design I've done before... In any case, it is clear now that SM5865 are decent chips .
There is the usual flaw in this design - transport/interface jitter attenuation in audio band is non-existant. I am now inclined to think this is the primary cause of "digital fatigue" in most DACs. In the next iteration, I will implement PLLed VCXO clock recovery and see if it helps...
About the sound:
I did a bit of listening (running from battery power) of different sources - 44.1kHz CD, 48kHz DVD, 24/96kHz DVD Audio. Overall first impression is quite good. Noise floor is very low and sounds white. In the quiteness, small details come through, and the dynamics is striking. Stereo imaging is good and effortless. Sibilance is controlled. I think I like this DAC better than PCM1730 design I've done before... In any case, it is clear now that SM5865 are decent chips .
There is the usual flaw in this design - transport/interface jitter attenuation in audio band is non-existant. I am now inclined to think this is the primary cause of "digital fatigue" in most DACs. In the next iteration, I will implement PLLed VCXO clock recovery and see if it helps...
Very nice design. I also applaud your usage of diff amps. Regarding that, I have one question:
What is the voltage level at IoutA? I am assuming it is zero (or Ioutaverage*4K7), but I expect the DAC would want it to be VCC/2 for optimal operation of the DAC unit itself.
My reason for asking is that a lot of DAC units want the DC level of the output current to be at VCC/2 hence the use of "instrumentation amplifiers" at the output as per the datasheet reference implementation.
I am not sure about this, hence my question.
Your answer to this question will be highly valuable to me.
Petter
What is the voltage level at IoutA? I am assuming it is zero (or Ioutaverage*4K7), but I expect the DAC would want it to be VCC/2 for optimal operation of the DAC unit itself.
My reason for asking is that a lot of DAC units want the DC level of the output current to be at VCC/2 hence the use of "instrumentation amplifiers" at the output as per the datasheet reference implementation.
I am not sure about this, hence my question.
Your answer to this question will be highly valuable to me.
Petter
What is the voltage level at IoutA? I am assuming it is zero (or Ioutaverage*4K7), but I expect the DAC would want it to be VCC/2 for optimal operation of the DAC unit itself.
The voltage level at Iout pins is indeed Vcc/2. Internal voltage divider references Vocm input of the differential amplifier midway between the rails, which are 0V and 5V. The catch is that output of the differential amplifier is also referenced to Vcc/2. This is pretty much unavoidable in single-supply system, but output transformer will solve that (and a few other ) problems.
It´s a beatiful work
Swering,
Excuse me but I do not understand Russian, therefore I´cand understand
your pdf, but I can understand the spectral analysis of your DAC -135db
and very clear only one peak at 2.0k residual.
I guess that the sound is very clear whit your OP42 and lh002, noramlly I use a discrete I/V and Buffer .
At any rate , the design work that you´re done es professional.
Congratulations.
Jesús
Swering,
Excuse me but I do not understand Russian, therefore I´cand understand
your pdf, but I can understand the spectral analysis of your DAC -135db
and very clear only one peak at 2.0k residual.
I guess that the sound is very clear whit your OP42 and lh002, noramlly I use a discrete I/V and Buffer .
At any rate , the design work that you´re done es professional.
Congratulations.
Jesús
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Digital Source
- Completed - NPC SM5847/SM5865 DAC