Building, Cutting, and Playing the World's Largest Record

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Of course it doesn't need to be a microgroove. I think we'll cut as large a groove as we can get away with. Can anybody help me select the largest cartridge that can achieve stereo? As far as I understand 78 cartridges only do mono. Or is that not correct? The schematics I found have 4 pickups inside, so I don't see why stereo isn't possible. I'd love some guidance on this.

Bigger unfortunately gets really expensive, really fast. And we also need to leave some room for us to break the record again. :)

I don't think using a laser cutter would give the right results. We've got a laser cutter in our shop and I wouldn't call it's output and cutting depth extremely consistent. Also, CO2 lasers are usually pulsed. Fast enough to not bother the cutting, but probably a problem producing audio. Besides, record cutting is a solved problem. We don't want to invent new techniques if we don't have to.
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Of course it doesn't need to be a microgroove. I think we'll cut as large a groove as we can get away with. Can anybody help me select the largest cartridge that can achieve stereo? As far as I understand 78 cartridges only do mono. Or is that not correct? The schematics I found have 4 pickups inside, so I don't see why stereo isn't possible. I'd love some guidance on this.
That's a very good question, and I was hoping to see some good answers. :(
Could be wrong, but I don't think the stereo playback with the big stylus is a problem. Just find a robust cartridge that can take a 78 stylus. Maybe a DJ cart that also has a 78 stylus available. I use an old Stanton 680 that will take either a microgroove or 78 stylus. Works well with the heavy wooden tonearm I have.

It's the cutting that might be difficult. You'd want a stereo cutter with a 78 stylus.
 
Of course it doesn't need to be a microgroove. I think we'll cut as large a groove as we can get away with. Can anybody help me select the largest cartridge that can achieve stereo? As far as I understand 78 cartridges only do mono. Or is that not correct? The schematics I found have 4 pickups inside, so I don't see why stereo isn't possible. I'd love some guidance on this.
As I mentioned, you can get a 78 stylus for many standard stereo cartridges. Your problem may be finding a stereo cutter that will cut a 78-sized groove. But surely the people on that other forum can tell you whether you can do that.
 
Since big platter would put pressure on bearing wouldn't it be good if light, stiff material be used for platter. or a light wood sandwiched between aluminium plate ? For Heavy platter I think magnet rings can also be used to ease the pressure on bearing. Presuming this would be belt drive, which motor will be used ? Would using two motor benefit if they share the load ?
 
Would be cheatin', but suppose you just draw a virtual groove with a ballpoint pen?

Surely not that difficult to have a robotic pickup follow the groove. Don't even need
to "spin" the record, thus truly absurd physical size is not limited by any turntable.

For "cuttting" the initial spiral, robot might be leashed to a string that winds on a post.

Even if you do cut a real groove into a real record, the record might not need to turn.
 
Building a big turning thing isn't the problem. I fabricate things for a living, and a big turntable is right in my wheelhouse. In fact, I built slightly comparable, slow turning thing:
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.

The wackywire was designed to slip very easily to prevent injury, but the premise is the same. We'll use bushings instead of bearings, so there's less vibration. The motor will be a 1/3hp motor that we can easily control with a speed controller to dial in the RPM. We'll be stepping down the RPM with two stages of pulleys as well.

The steel is on its way. I'll be able to post photos of the build soon.
 
the arm will weigh a ton! You'll need a beyond stiff suspension to have it work.
Why worry about groove dimensions and spacing? Build an oversized cartridge with 2-3X normal dimensions. It won't be very hi-fi but it would certainly satisfy the requirements!
I imagine you could make a very simple transducer out of an old Victrola pickup, with a magnet & coil, OR just mount a conventional MM cartridge so it's excited & coupled to the Victrola pickup.
The disc? I'm leaning towards finding an enlightened machine-shop. Download the audio file and engineer a screw drive across the disc with a very energetic backwards engineered copy of your pickup.

And, pray no one turns up a giant disc and Victrola or Edison machine built 100 years ago as a promotional ploy!
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.