BF862 instead of 2sk170?

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
> Since the BF862 is good for only 20-25V, it would be logical to cascode it anyway.

The 2SJ74 is also 25V, which will be sufficient for a large proportion of applications.
If you really want to go higher, then 2SK209 will be a good cascode.
But now you double your matching problem.

Technically all solvable, of course.


Patrick
 
> If you use an SMT adapter the leads will bleed off some heat.

To where, the FR4 PCB material (poor thermal conductor) ?

For audio applications, one wishes to place a gate stopper close to the gate pin.
So the copper on which the gate pin is soldered cannot have a large are for dissipation.


Patrick

Just an idea, you can also pour copper on the bottom and punch through vias.
 

Attachments

  • JFET Adapter.png
    JFET Adapter.png
    42.4 KB · Views: 892
but there should be a reason why BF862 sounds better when 2sk170 is replaced?

I have a strong feeling that the input capacitance of BF862 is quite low as low as 3 times that of the 2sk170. Transconductance is double but will that really help?
Noise is also little bit better.
How far does the input capacitance makes difference?
 
I fear you might be barking up the wrong tree if you're trying to discern some sort of audibility test between these two JFETS: they're either appropriately designed into the circuit and do their job, or not.

The higher speed of the BF82 does come at some stability cost.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.