Just by getting rid of the crappy inductors I have managed to get a significant improvement in efficiency.
I will work on the crossover now
Black is the old passive crossover and Blue is the initial response with inductors removed
Attachments
Guess what?
I hate BSC by attenuation. It sucks all the air and clarity out of the music.
I am finding it sounds much better by correcting with gain using a DEQ or .5 way or just play with the baffle dimensions etc
Don't ask me why it sounds better. I have no idea. It just sounds significantly better
I hate BSC by attenuation. It sucks all the air and clarity out of the music.
I am finding it sounds much better by correcting with gain using a DEQ or .5 way or just play with the baffle dimensions etc
Don't ask me why it sounds better. I have no idea. It just sounds significantly better
Last edited:
Dave at Planet 10 says he likes only 3dB of baffle step vs 6 often used.
That would be a misquote. 6 dB is very often too much because speakers usually interact with the room (room gain etc). I rarely use an BS EQ.
dave
don't need big email
txt is short : put halcro in
How about lu1014d frontend connected to lateral mosfet circlotron (unfinished Dumb-O-Tron) output?
Probably stick with the Balanced BA3 front end
Last edited:
ya need ball$$ & mileage to make it right
besides , there is a reason why Gray Head invented Ultra Symmetry ........... and he 's probably with reason liking it more than Supersymmetry
edit: there is a finished and tried bloody serbian toobsusymosfetcircl , linked somewhere in dumboth thread
besides , there is a reason why Gray Head invented Ultra Symmetry ........... and he 's probably with reason liking it more than Supersymmetry
edit: there is a finished and tried bloody serbian toobsusymosfetcircl , linked somewhere in dumboth thread
Last edited:
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- B5 Opening Ceremony - Active vs Passive