Hi,
As Wavebourn says go for one triode and one pentode!
This is a serious approach to the concept using a DHT and a tetrode:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1613405#post1613405
And why not read the whole triode/antitriode-thread?
The interesting thing using this concept is that you get SE harmonic footprint.
As Wavebourn says go for one triode and one pentode!
This is a serious approach to the concept using a DHT and a tetrode:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=1613405#post1613405
And why not read the whole triode/antitriode-thread?
The interesting thing using this concept is that you get SE harmonic footprint.
Hej Lasse Revintage, Surprise !
Yes, I'm wondering if that EAR-amp is alive now??....I felt sorry for him when he picked it up, because it became too expensive, so he got a bag of spare tubes and a new sixpack of 6550's for his Ampeg bass amp too. I heard he was in contact with the Paravincini gang in England and confident about getting the EAR in working order.
JohanB
Yes, I'm wondering if that EAR-amp is alive now??....I felt sorry for him when he picked it up, because it became too expensive, so he got a bag of spare tubes and a new sixpack of 6550's for his Ampeg bass amp too. I heard he was in contact with the Paravincini gang in England and confident about getting the EAR in working order.
JohanB
revintage said:
...to get a SE-Pull configuration, like I did in Alligator amp, but much cheaper!
In Alligator I used one triode VS one precision SS modulated current source. What I've found, practically such complexity was meaningless: triode half varied own amplification factor while SS part continued to deliver a stable current swing. Using triode VS pentode you are getting almost the same result: SE sound from PP transformer.
I call it SEPull. The name reflects functions, I like it.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.