• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

amplifier output impedance measurement

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Just thought about another aspect of this. You know those input/output differencing tests by Peter Baxandall and Dave Hafler, where they subtract amp input from a (fraction of) amp output in opposite phase. What is left is the distortion, and you can thus listen to that in isolation.

To get a good subtraction you have to send the input signal through a low pass filter to mimic the low pass character of the amp, and you can with some care get a null of 60dB or more.

This would not work if there was any delay in the amp.

Jan
 
Just thought about another aspect of this. You know those input/output differencing tests by Peter Baxandall and Dave Hafler, where they subtract amp input from a (fraction of) amp output in opposite phase. What is left is the distortion, and you can thus listen to that in isolation.

To get a good subtraction you have to send the input signal through a low pass filter to mimic the low pass character of the amp, and you can with some care get a null of 60dB or more.

This would not work if there was any delay in the amp.

Jan

Some tests of this nature actually include a specific length of shielded cable to add a time delay to the input, for correct timing in the cancellation.
 
100kHz HF rolloff will give you an apparent 'delay' of 1.6us.

Yes, for a single frequency signal (a sine wave) we could view a phase shift as a sort of time delay (assuming no amplitude change).
However, for a signal that contains more than one frequency this would not work, since the waveform's time domain shape would not be preserved.
To keep the waveform the same shape, the phase shift must be proportional to frequency. This mathematically is a pure delay.
A low pass filter has a nonlinear phase shift, described by an arctangent function, as well as the amplitude changes.
 
Last edited:
Just thought about another aspect of this. You know those input/output differencing tests by Peter Baxandall and Dave Hafler, where they subtract amp input from a (fraction of) amp output in opposite phase. What is left is the distortion, and you can thus listen to that in isolation.

To get a good subtraction you have to send the input signal through a low pass filter to mimic the low pass character of the amp, and you can with some care get a null of 60dB or more.

This would not work if there was any delay in the amp.
In fact, it would work and it actually works, yet amplifiers have some tens (or more) of ns of pure (TL-like) delay.
You just need to have the phase shift right for the fundamental, the rest is unimportant and this can be implemented with a number (down to 1) of 1st order cells
Group delay comes to mind... :cool:
JD dreamt it, LV did it:
The parameter linking the two is called group delay, but there are some caveats: it has to do with cutoff frequencies, etc.
In addition, it isn't flat with frequency, unlike an ideal transmission line.
 
Just thought about another aspect of this. You know those input/output differencing tests by Peter Baxandall and Dave Hafler, where they subtract amp input from a (fraction of) amp output in opposite phase. What is left is the distortion, and you can thus listen to that in isolation.

To get a good subtraction you have to send the input signal through a low pass filter to mimic the low pass character of the amp, and you can with some care get a null of 60dB or more.

This would not work if there was any delay in the amp.

Jan
Sure it would- but you would not get an accurate measurement of the distortion...
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.