• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

Advice for EL84 SE PCB

Hello all. I've been quiet for a while- workshop is in the middle of a very slow remodel, and most of my gear is buried. Taking that time to plan some projects, and get parts together until I can clear off a workspace to get back to multiple in-progress PCB work (the 6v6 Salas boards, my PSU boards, among others) and resume hobby stuff. I also ordered some of my PSU mosfet filter PCBs, based on Millet's mosfet filter from his Engineer's amplifier.

A while back I designed a quick EL84 SE stereo PCB, and since I had a coupon from JLCPCB, I ordered a set to play with. I have some generic 5K SE output transformers, and plenty of Sovtek EL84, Surplus 6P14P, 6N1P, 6N2P, cleartop 6CG7/6FQ7, and a suitable power transformer that should give ~290-300 volts after smoothing. Easy peasy right?

Just to be clear, I will not be purchasing any additional tubes or transformers here. I am restricting those choices to parts on hand. I have a big enough stash that I will not be spending anything except on the chassis, most likely.

Here's the Schematic, the LED is in parallel with the spot for a resistor, in order to be somewhat universal, I'm likely using a bypassed resistor-

SENOVAL-1 (1).png


And here's some pics of the 100mm square PCB, only change is that I rounded the corners, added a capacitor across R9 for feedback compensation if needed, and ordered them in purple. The PCB allows pentode, triode, or UL connection-

SE0209top.png

SE0209bottom.png


Here's a multi-layer view of the 50mm square power supply PCB i have coming as well-
Mosfet ripple filter.png


Transformer specs (generic black chinese units, no frequency graph)-
REHOC Inductance Value: 12H
Primary DC Resistance: 315 ohm
distance of mounting holes: 72 mm
colour: black
Material: metal
Size: 60x55x50mm
Weight: .41kg
They arrived very beat up and dented, and I received a refund, in addition to that, I got to keep them. Some work to clean up the dents and some hammertone paint to cover the imperfections should make them perfect for a prototype build. Reviews on them were found that explain them to work well within the 4-5 watt power level, and they allegedly have adequate frequency response as well.

61Xg9bjfaGL._AC_SX679_.jpg



My chosen operation point for the EL84 is 5K load, 250 volts plate to cathode, and a bypassed cathode resistor, value to be determined by the choice to run either pentode or triode. Going to likely go off the datasheet values and adjust as needed for the 6P14P/EL84 that I have on hand.


So my main debate here, is what to do for the main topology.

I am currently considering the following three options for overall circuit configuration-
-Pentode output, 6N2P input, with cathode feedback to the 6N2P
-Triode connected output, 6CG7 or 6N1P input, no global feedback
-Triode connected output, 6N2P input, with cathode feedback to the 6N2P

I really like the idea of triode with global feedback, but I also really like the idea of running a 6CG7/6FQ7 front end, with the disadvantage being I will not have much headroom for lower level sources. Since the output stage only needs like ~8 volts bias worst case, I should have no issues running the lower mu front end. I have many 6FQ7 cleartops onhand, and less 6N2P onhand. The lower power output of triode mode is no trouble, as this amplifier will be run near field with DIY speakers of reasonable efficiency. I'm not terribly fond of triode/pentode switching, so It will likely stay in whichever configuration I build it into unless there is a compelling reason to change it up later.

Any input?

Almost everything I build is pentode connected with global feedback. Rarely do I ever go for something run "wide open" so I feel like I'm cheating going for zero global feedback. Last EL84 triode build I did was push pull with global feedback as well.

Thanks for taking a look!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
"Reviews on them were found that explain them to work well within the 4-5 watt power level, and they allegedly have adequate frequency response as well."

Anthony, that transformer, can you be more specific please? Where can I find those reviews?
Thanks in advance,
Joe.
 
I have one of the same transformers. Search Amazon for "Acxico 1Pcs 5K 5W Single-Ended Output Audio Transformers 6P1 6P14 6P6 Tube Amp Output Transformers."

The reviews on them are all over the place performance wise though.

I ordered two but only got one. Amazon shipped me a second one but I never got it. Tracking showed that it was last scanned in New Jersey, but Amazon said it was delivered and refused to refund it or ship another. Like the OP's, the one that I got looked like it lost a fight with multiple bruises and bends, but it worked. Since I only got one it went into a Champ style guitar amp that used a 12AX7 driving an EL84. No testing was ever done but it does make a nice sounding guitar amp of about 5 watts. It's not as loud (efficient) as the old Edcor I took out of the amp, but the Edcors have nearly doubled in price since I bought a pair in about 2005.
 
"Reviews on them were found that explain them to work well within the 4-5 watt power level, and they allegedly have adequate frequency response as well."

Anthony, that transformer, can you be more specific please? Where can I find those reviews?
Thanks in advance,
Joe.
Amazon listings. There are multiple listings for them, I'll see if I can dig one out.

Also, currently leaning towards this overall scheme-
Triode connected output, 6N2P input, with cathode feedback to the 6N2P.
 
It's interesting looking at your PCB designs. I also designed a PCB using Pete's design but decided not to use a ground plane because I was concerned about the distance between the copper layer and the ground plane layer being too small. I don't know the recommended distance and possibly you could let me know what is ok.

ray
 
IPC-9592 and IPC-2221B distance calculator
The following calculator offers a safe distance calculation based on the standards mentioned above. To use the calculator, simply enter the operating voltage at which you want your circuit board to operate. The calculator will then automatically tell you the spacing requirements for internal, external and coated traces in the PCB layout. The calculator can also calculate the values for IPC-9592-compliant voltage converters for you.

https://resources.altium.com/de/p/using-an-ipc-2221-calculator-for-high-voltage-design

calculator about halfway down the page.
Every layout program can also set this individually for conductor tracks that carry a high voltage!