900W H-class PA Amp with Limiter

I found a errata on one of the bleeder resistor here is the updated file I might be wrong but I can see that there are two bleeder resistors connected on the same -120V spot is odd to me so I changed but the first files still the same so you can see what I mean

If you don't mind, maybe you can make another version with this diode.

Regards
 

Attachments

  • 2263577_0e12fabc-3c78-4ffe-9c7f-48159603b772_1548_1548_1.jpg
    2263577_0e12fabc-3c78-4ffe-9c7f-48159603b772_1548_1548_1.jpg
    46.2 KB · Views: 749
If you don't mind, maybe you can make another version with this diode.

Regards


I can do that sure :) also yesterday I found out that the PNP transistor BF421 is obsolete and no longer available "they can be found on eBay well I rather change that" so I changed for KSP92 that have the same characteristics the only difference is the pins, the BF421 is E C B and the KSP92 is E B C so I have to update the PCB to accommodate the KSP92 and also MPSA92 can be use I will leave the update Sprint Layout 6 file here but, at the same time I will leave the original layout intact on the same file
 

Attachments

  • Apex H900 files.zip
    249.2 KB · Views: 350
  • Apex H900 with PNP transistor KSP92.jpg
    Apex H900 with PNP transistor KSP92.jpg
    467.3 KB · Views: 938
  • MPSA92-D.PDF
    104.8 KB · Views: 183
  • KSP92-889512.pdf
    165.8 KB · Views: 212
  • BF421-D.PDF
    105.3 KB · Views: 145
  • no longer available.JPG
    no longer available.JPG
    42.1 KB · Views: 855
  • DigiKey.JPG
    DigiKey.JPG
    133.1 KB · Views: 827
I can do that sure :) also yesterday I found out that the PNP transistor BF421 is obsolete and no longer available "they can be found on eBay well I rather change that" so I changed for KSP92 that have the same characteristics the only difference is the pins, the BF421 is E C B and the KSP92 is E B C so I have to update the PCB to accommodate the KSP92 and also MPSA92 can be use I will leave the update Sprint Layout 6 file here but, at the same time I will leave the original layout intact on the same file

I guess BF421 still produce by KEC Korea Electronic.
Why don't you design pcb for H900P, latest sch from Apexaudio?
It has more vas current and add vi limiter.
 
I'm confused about top rail comutation mosfets

Hi I think this might be the lat post about me studies of the Apex H900 and I was able to simulated and works really well a lot more power than what I really need it is capable of give more than 1200W to 4 ohms load the THD is high after it reach 1250W about 0.6% THD not bad I think the only thing that got me confused is that the +HV 120V the mosfets orientation the simulation results is weird if I place the D drain to +HV120 to be honest I'm not so familiar with mosfets so will this does not matter? :confused: I really don't want to made a mistake and change the layout clone I did if that does not matter please let me know



I think most be the simulation but I want to be sure
 

Attachments

  • Apex H900 rails.JPG
    Apex H900 rails.JPG
    289.2 KB · Views: 759
  • Apex H900 HV rail mosfet orientation.pdf
    506.9 KB · Views: 313
  • Apex H900 HV 120 rail mosfets orientation.mp4
    4.7 MB
  • Apex H900 +120 HV rails mosfets.JPG
    Apex H900 +120 HV rails mosfets.JPG
    124.3 KB · Views: 692
  • Apex H900 simulation.zip
    846.1 KB · Views: 282
Last edited: