24/192 basic question

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
frugal-phile™
Joined 2001
Paid Member
DAD - DAD

These guys have been doing 384 for some time.

  • Fully Modular - 224 different configurations
  • Sample rates and I/O structure can be upgraded
  • From 2 to 8 analog Line or Mic input channels
  • From 2 to 8 analog output channels
  • 24 bit PCM sample rates up to 384 kHz
  • DXD sample-rate: 352.8 kHz
  • DSD sample rates: 64fs & 128 fs

2L in Norway uses their kit for recording.

dave
 
someone hasn't searched too hard if they're quoting Oohashi without mentioning the lack of replication, several lines of criticism easily found by just a little more search

no one is rewriting chapters in their psychoacoustics textbooks yet based on the "hypersonic effect" paper

it simply isn't "proved" that higher sampling rates are audible in music reproduction

I am quite sympathetic to the idea that there are technical reasons to want more passband to Nyquist margin than Redbook, but there simply are no recording mics, or loudspeakers with fc demanding >192 ks/s sample rates

the only reason to use > 192k would be to capture analog master tape bias frequency to apply Plangent Processes tech to peel off a layer of analog tape stick/slip mechanical flutter modulation
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.