Funniest snake oil theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lots of snake oil stuff in health foods. The health industry can’t reach a consensus on many things, and there is a wealth of contradictory results from studies.

One of the greasiest- whole wheat is good for you! Recently, after witnessing a work buddy's 6 month transformation- lost 75 lbs, doesn't miss workdays from soreness anymore, lots of energy, I tried his method: the Paleo Diet. I didn't stick with it more than 2 months, but dropped @ 25 lbs, have more energy, my ruptured discs, torn rotator cuff, and knee damage still rarely bother me, while still not eating grain products. They are hard to avoid!
I wish my hearing would have improved, but it's still the same. (Cue Bob Seger).
 
Here's my question... When the default refresh rate of analog tv was 24fsp, why are all digital TVs using multiples of 30fps? It results in some pretty weird (awful) images on newer TVs when they try to inject intermediate frames for fix it.

NTSC BW was 30Hz (I think they used the power line 60hz to sync) when color started they went 29.97 fps. Any one who did audio for tv remembers the fun when the dialogue was acidentaly synced at 30 fps.
PAL was always 25 fps.
 
I work as 1st AC. I get a stomach ache every time I see the image of an HD telly, the worst I currently know of being Sony's HDR stuff. What people had in their living rooms in SD times on CRTs was WAY WAY WAY closer to what is actually produced by film crews than what finds it's way onto a HD flatscreen after a load of digital "enhancements" done by the telly processing software. There was a time when a moire effect was considered an image defect, with artificial image sharpening way more artefacts have become "standard". It's just crazy.
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2017
NTSC BW was 30Hz (I think they used the power line 60hz to sync) when color started they went 29.97 fps. Any one who did audio for tv remembers the fun when the dialogue was acidentaly synced at 30 fps.
PAL was always 25 fps.

Yeah PAL countries aren't idiots.

29.97 fps? COME ON! That is just blatantly mischievous. What is the reason behind choosing that number!? Why not 30fps? Just silly.

Then you realise that they had to do that in order to fill in all the color information in the signal because NTSC is a hackjob to get black and white monitors/televisions to not produce interference when trying to display a color signal, yet more backwards compatability. Cinema Tools 4 User Manual

NTSC - Wikipedia

So the frame rate of television was actually exactly 30 frames per second at one point in time. However that all changed when color television was introduced. When a signal for color information was added to the television transmission there was a big problem. The color carrier signal was phasing with with the sound carrier signal because they were very close in the spectrum. This made the picture look un-watchable. The quick fix they came up with was to reduce the framerate by .03fps which moved the two signals out of phase.


About Frame Rates or Why 29.97? — the automatic filmmaker
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2017
Here's my question... When the default refresh rate of analog tv was 24fsp, why are all digital TVs using multiples of 30fps? It results in some pretty weird (awful) images on newer TVs when they try to inject intermediate frames for fix it.

Its all about legacy support.

The 35mm film predates television so therefore that format is what decided the framerate for the future.

Then television comes along and is capable of much better framerates, better still early televisions and their cameras needed to be synched to the mains line frequency and whatever frequency in each country is used is what is displayed on the television.

So you have the clashing of these two techologies trying to work together to display an image and a compromised was met.
 
Last edited:
The 35mm film predates television so therefore that format is what decided the framerate for the future.

60Hz countries use 24fps with an 172.8° shutter angle, 50Hz countries 25fps with 180° shutter angle as standard. One reason I can think of is that these are so called "flicker free speeds" meaning when you work with mains powered light (tungsten or HMI) sources the light doesn't flicker in the recorded image.
 
60Hz countries use 24fps with an 172.8° shutter angle, 50Hz countries 25fps with 180° shutter angle as standard. One reason I can think of is that these are so called "flicker free speeds" meaning when you work with mains powered light (tungsten or HMI) sources the light doesn't flicker in the recorded image.

Flicker (of the image) in 50Hz countries is unbearable for me.

The history of telecine is useful here. Telecine - Wikipedia
 
One of the greasiest- whole wheat is good for you! Recently, after witnessing a work buddy's 6 month transformation- lost 75 lbs, doesn't miss workdays from soreness anymore, lots of energy, I tried his method: the Paleo Diet. I didn't stick with it more than 2 months, but dropped @ 25 lbs, have more energy, my ruptured discs, torn rotator cuff, and knee damage still rarely bother me, while still not eating grain products. They are hard to avoid!

I wish my hearing would have improved, but it's still the same. (Cue Bob Seger).

There are a maze of wheat products these days, and they taste good. But I also get lots of negative effects, stomach feels bloated, joints feel sour, tongue gets white (not good sign in Chinese medicine). But if I limit consumption, then it is not too bad. Sugar is pretty bad as well. But quite often I find it helps when I get drowsy at the wheel to take something sweet to raise blood sugar fast.

Sugar alternatives are probably worse. But it is advertised so much that it gets into the brains of so many people...
 
I'll take sugar over the chemical crap they push on people as a "diet" alternative.

I don't use much sugar except in cooking and use raw sugar most of the time. I haven't purchased commercial "Brown" sugar in 20 years (except Billington's) . I use sugar in the raw and add molasses to make brown sugar, and use it sparingly.
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2017
Interesting video: YouTube

With maths.

One of the comments in the youtube video says that if they simply increased the number of lines then home tv owners would have to change both the vertical and horizontal position and size of the picture every time that they changed tv channels because of the two channel formats (such as color and black and white transmissions), which is I think is a valid point.

OMG, 625 line color in the US would be a terrible idea! 1) You would need to adjust BOTH the horizontal hold AND vertical hold EVERY TIME YOU CHANGED THE CHANNEL. Many sets had the horizontal hold in the back of the set. Remember, it wasn't until the mid 1970's that the last US tv stations went to color. 2) It would REDUCE the horizontal resolution because the scan beam would have to move left to right more quickly (18,750 hz) without extra bandwidth to compensate, and also lower the chroma resolution. 3) It would make it HARDER to convert from 50 hz to 60 hz and back because line memory converters can't change the 15,750 frequency to the needed 18,750 for 625/60. Even with today's digital 1080i converters you have a problem where field 1 matches exactly, and then field 5/6 is totally out of phase. 4) Similarly, a color station could not broadcast ANY of their black and white 525 line video recordings, or live feeds from any 525 line source. 5) Expensive Quad video tape recorders would have to be much more extensively modified to record and play 625/60. Specifically the speed of the rotating drum would need to change to prevent the video heads from switching in the middle of a scan line. That would require changes to the tape speed as well and all sorts of other issues that would likely make the machine unable to record or even play back. And all this for what? To prevent a number that no viewer ever needed to know about? ================= Europe didn't do anything particularly clever with TV. They just watched how the American system worked for 10 years, and then shifted some of the easier numbers around. The hard part was how to build a color CRT, and discovering that HSB was possible and RGB unnecessary. You said it yourself - PAL was built around the knowledge America developed with NTSC.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.