negative feedback

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
I did not say that.
If that was understood then it was not understood well.
In my last post I even explained way it still work.
The main idea is that the system and his feedback should be fast enought (maybe by ten's time faster ) that any perturbation that can apear.
If the perturbation is faster than the system, the result can be unexpected as in the example with the hoverboards when not the feedback but speed of the system was not enough to compensate the perturbation.

I'm not a fan of the no feedback amplifiers. I'm in searching of the fastest but stiil stable amplifiers.

Yo should really read Bruno´s article on the F word to better understand ´slow´ and ´fast´ in this context.
Especially the chapter Open loop bandwidth as a measure of speed starting on page 7.

https://linearaudio.net/sites/linearaudio.net/files/volume1bp.pdf

Jan
 
Last edited:
For ME an amplifiers shoud have low pas filtre at the input and output with a bandwidth not more over audio, let's say 100khz BUT the internal speed high, low delay and capable of full power bandwidth of over 5Mhz.
On Sara amplifier (you can find it here on forum) I measured over 1Mhz full power bandwidth but I want more because I want sr of over 250V/usec not "only" 80V/usec like în Sara.
 

PRR

Member
Joined 2003
Paid Member
> Most audio circuits have an open loop bandwidth which is much smaller than audio bandwidth. They work fine.

The gain may be rolling-off by 100Hz or lower.

However the DC gain may be a million. 100Hz high-cut, we still have gain of 10,000 at 10KHz. Say closed-loop gain is 20. We have 500:1 of NFB at 10KHz, 250:1 at 20KHz. Any error is about 0.5% of the naked amplifier. If the "error" is 10% THD, this becomes 0.04% THD. While not zero, it is very-very low.

Many authors suggest that the LF corner of the open-loop gain is not very important. What matters is that you have a gob of gain all over the audio band. And in practice, we specifically set the open-loop audio gain (with compensation) and let the DC and LF gain be what it is.

OTOH, the inevitable declining NFB with rising freq does lead to rising THD, which "may" be more offensive than a flat THD plot. (This path is well-trodden by low-NFB fans.)
 
There are 2 types of Anti-NFB fans:
1.) Who does not know how to use NFB properly. They spread the myth that any NFB is bad, except may be some "low feedback" that they are not afraid of.
2.) Who know nothing, and trust #1. I call them "Cargo-Culturists"

Also, there are 2 types of FB fans, who:
1) don't understand that not only THD matters, but also how sound different misbehave-conditions. They tend to apply as much as possible of global only feedback.
2) who understands how feedback works, and pays attention to minimise all audible distortions, searching for optimal results. They (we, actually) prefer nested feedbacks, that can get both low IMD before clipping like "as much as possible global feedback", but as less as possible audible distortions when an amp grossly misbehaves, like "no feedback at all" amps.
 
For ME an amplifiers shoud have low pas filtre at the input and output with a bandwidth not more over audio, let's say 100khz BUT the internal speed high, low delay and capable of full power bandwidth of over 5Mhz.
On Sara amplifier (you can find it here on forum) I measured over 1Mhz full power bandwidth but I want more because I want sr of over 250V/usec not "only" 80V/usec like în Sara.

Use CFA topology. Dadod, Bonsai, Lazy Cat made some here and I did, but I do not share it here.
 
I do not like tube amplifiers. The are to sensibile (mecanic) and draw to much current and are to slow-verry low SR.

Really? :D

100 KHz triangle, 120V swing. Do you want anything faster? :D

Tower-IV-TP-3.gif


Tower-IV-Top.gif
 
sesebe said:
For ME an amplifiers shoud have low pas filtre at the input and output with a bandwidth not more over audio, let's say 100khz BUT the internal speed high, low delay and capable of full power bandwidth of over 5Mhz.
I wondered if that might be the case. You may need to review your understanding of feedback.

Because I like redhead and you like blondes.
So you accept that your preference for wide bandwidth and high slew rate is not related to actual performance, but is merely cosmetic? That is fine, but newbies reading your remarks might be confused by them.

Wavebourn said:
There are 2 types of Anti-NFB fans:
1.) Who does not know how to use NFB properly. They spread the myth that any NFB is bad, except may be some "low feedback" that they are not afraid of.
2.) Who know nothing, and trust #1. I call them "Cargo-Culturists"
Yes.
 
..................
So you accept that your preference for wide bandwidth and high slew rate is not related to actual performance, but is merely cosmetic? That is fine, but newbies reading your remarks might be confused by them.
............................



I would not say it is cosmetic but more a taste problem and personal preference based on audio experiences.
I liked the sound of a big SR amplifier with compared to my Yamaha that has an SR of 100V / usec or close.
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.