Ok, I'll take it back, it's not a swindle. Glossy high end audio magazines reviewers are like George Constanza said:
George Constanza said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by George Constanza
I lie every second of the day. My entire life is a sham.
Ok, I'm convinced.
Last edited:
Let say the reviewer says brand X sounds fantastic and describes what and why he thinks so. Then, later, the readers get hold of it and they all think it sucks badly. How would a fake review be of any use to a magazine. Maybe for a short time before going out of business. But SP and TAS haven't gone out of business. There is some >50% agreement going on.
-RNM
-RNM
High-end audio (in electronics, anyway) is already splitting hairs. Unless something is grossly wrong with a product then most people who buy it will love it, because it sounds not-broken, cost them a lot of money, and it's their new shiny object.
Like making fine wine, we are not 'splitting hairs' in improving audio products. There is still much that can be learned that will make audio sound much better. I learn almost every week something new and actually important (to me at least) and I use it to improve my audio products and personal system as well.
All posts related to Scott's discrete-FET RIAA preamplifier, have been moved to his new thread
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/anal...al-single-ended-phono-preamp.html#post5042118
Thank you for your understanding.
George
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/anal...al-single-ended-phono-preamp.html#post5042118
Thank you for your understanding.
George
Entertainment. If they started writing like the Audio Critic they would vanish fast. 6moons is also still around.
And this is despite it getting increasingly hard to actual find the review text buried in the adverts. Of course Richard, at least until his monsterblocks(tm) arrive is listening to a pro audio DAC feeding pro audio amps into proaudio speakers. This would indicate pro stuff is rather good these days 
I think you, & some others, might have missed my Post # 92039 about CPU Optimising & how to "grab a processor core" for Free
Can you provide a link? That post number was in the future when you posted. I'm interested in understanding more.
If was about using Sysinternals Process Explorer to set Processor Affinity.
You can get it here: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/sysinternals/processexplorer.aspx
It may also be of interest to read "Troubleshooting with the Windows Sysinternals Tools," as not everything about the Sysintnernals tools is explained in the help files.
EDIT: It is also possible to set Processor Affinity with scripts or through the programmer's API.
Some other sometimes useful tools are described here:
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1352792
Last edited:
Bad logic: all crows are black birds
your logic is unsound insofar as that you impute that, therefore, all black birds are crows.
OTH I knew several UK Hi-Fi journalists over the years, all bar one notable exception were fair and balanced in their judgements...insofar as their experience and skills allowed them. The one exception to that was a guy who was 'buyable'....but his magazine was not.
Last edited:
Demian, ZeroD’s link was correct when he wrote it.
After some posts have been moved, post numbers have changed. Here is the post that ZeroD meant:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/loun...ch-preamplifier-part-ii-9198.html#post5056611
George
Hi, yes i thought you might be
? at first
Due to below, now i understandI would have, but gpapag has kindly done so
before i logged back in just now.Post back & let us know how you get on etc
I posted another about "Comparing files for Exactness" straight after that one, you & others might also find useful, but that hadn't been updated ? Anyway here it is now as Post # 92029 http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/loun...ch-preamplifier-part-ii-9203.html#post5057496
You are so right; selling to audiophiles is like pushing anti wrinkle cream. Perceived quality is proportionate to price, not product quality.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.