Low-distortion Audio-range Oscillator

I've had the good fortune to have dinner with Bruno several times and I almost always catch a conversation at the various audio trade shows. I have zero worries about Bruno going to the dark side, he is a gifted engineer and his tolerance for B.S. is very low...

I bumped into him at the recent AES show in L.A. and learned more in 10 mins than I did at the whole rest of the show.

I agree, Bruno and I have had dinner together and talked and exchanged emails numerous times. A brilliant guy.

That is not to say that in the audiophile world there is not wiggle room for some differences of opinion, even between or among gifted and brilliant engineers, or even just smart and intuitive engineers who have good critical thinking skills.

One of the fascinating things about the audiophile world is that I'm guessing about half of what we hear is snake oil and the other half has at least some scientific basis, but it is often challenging to know which is which. Someone said that if you hear a difference and the cause can't be found in measurements, then you are not measuring the right thing.

I still remember the early days of solid state power amplifiers, when every one thought initially that they sounded really good, and later many realized that they did not sound as good as they thought, and then even later people realized that they needed to get more sophisticated in measurements, or interpretation of measurements to understand at least some of the causes of the audible shortcomings of of the early solid state amplifiers.

We may be in a similar early time with class D amplifiers. I do not believe, for example, that the conventional measurements we apply to class D amplifiers are adequate to measure some of the shortcomings that this new technology has. 20kHz THD, for example, is virtually useless for class D amplifiers. CCIF 19+20kHz with spectral analysis is much better, and quite useful, but I doubt that it catches everything. 19Hz+20Hz is a tempting test to catch some of the effects of bus pumping. I hope to touch on some of these tests in the second edition of my book.

This is not to say that there are not some very good-sounding class D amplifiers out there. Tremendous progress had been made in class D performance in the last 10 years, and Bruno is one of the people that has played a big role in that.

Cheers,
Bob
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2012
One of the spin-off's of Digital amps are their power supplies. it these can be made suitable for Hi-End performance requirements, they would save a lot in the shipping weight and costs.

The recommended digital amps with the JBL M2 speakers is the Crown iT5000 HD. Besides being ridiculously powerful, they actually sound quite good. Of course, the speakers have a lot to do with that great sound.

When the new analog CFA PA's arrive here, I will tap into the Crown amps cross-over to the amp go out to the CFA and listen. But the class D (?) is pretty good.... small, clean, powerful, light weight..... look forward to increased improvements.


THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
I think we stopped at the summing averaging process because there isn't anything simple around to do that. The hardware can get quite complex even just to do two channels.
I think everyone backed away from that one.

Are you talking DAC or ADC? Summing DAC's is pretty straightforward- unless you want to do some unusual thing. I have one DAC here that sume two outputs which are offset from 0 by a grey code to ensure that the outputs do not sit at zero. Interesting but not magic that I could see.

Summing ADC inputs is more complex but at 192 KHz the ADI 1940 can mix 8 stereo ADC's AD1940 Datasheet and Product Info | Analog Devices . making a PCB with 8 AK5394A's would be fun. Maybe Richard can bring his guys in on this. Theoretically summing 8 channels will get 9? dB improvement in SNR, already 123 dB, and if mixed correctly some distortion cancellation.
 
One of the spin-off's of Digital amps are their power supplies. it these can be made suitable for Hi-End performance requirements, they would save a lot in the shipping weight and costs.

The recommended digital amps with the JBL M2 speakers is the Crown iT5000 HD. Besides being ridiculously powerful, they actually sound quite good. Of course, the speakers have a lot to do with that great sound.

When the new analog CFA PA's arrive here, I will tap into the Crown amps cross-over to the amp go out to the CFA and listen. But the class D (?) is pretty good.... small, clean, powerful, light weight..... look forward to increased improvements.


THx-RNMarsh

One of the new chapters in my second edition is a big one on switching power supplies in general, and for audio power amps in particular.

Of course, most pro amps of any significant power use SMPS already, be they class AB or class D amps. There are numerous different ways to implement SMPS supplies for audio power amps, including where to place the majority of the energy storage (reservoir) capacitance; on the input side of the main SMPS on the 385V intermediate bus, or on the dual-polarity main amplifier rails on the output side of the main SMPS. Similarly, there are different ways to deal with the issue of regulation.

Cheers,
Bob
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
In my testing of the previous generation of the ESS DAC's they were very good but not quite up to the claimed numbers. I'm not cure how successfully you can compensate for analog distortion with digital tweaks. Pure sine waves would be the best target, audio seems unlikely.
 
Are you talking DAC or ADC? Summing DAC's is pretty straightforward- unless you want to do some unusual thing. I have one DAC here that sume two outputs which are offset from 0 by a grey code to ensure that the outputs do not sit at zero. Interesting but not magic that I could see.

Summing ADC inputs is more complex but at 192 KHz the ADI 1940 can mix 8 stereo ADC's AD1940 Datasheet and Product Info | Analog Devices . making a PCB with 8 AK5394A's would be fun. Maybe Richard can bring his guys in on this. Theoretically summing 8 channels will get 9? dB improvement in SNR, already 123 dB, and if mixed correctly some distortion cancellation.

I meant ADCs.

I wasn't aware of the ADI part. I'll have a closer look at that later today.
It looks like it should be fun for all sorts of things besides the topic at hand.
Mixed with some analog loops etc.
 
One of the new chapters in my second edition is a big one on switching power supplies in general, and for audio power amps in particular.

Of course, most pro amps of any significant power use SMPS already, be they class AB or class D amps. There are numerous different ways to implement SMPS supplies for audio power amps, including where to place the majority of the energy storage (reservoir) capacitance; on the input side of the main SMPS on the 385V intermediate bus, or on the dual-polarity main amplifier rails on the output side of the main SMPS. Similarly, there are different ways to deal with the issue of regulation.

Cheers,
Bob

Why not just make the power supply and amplifier one? Instead of SMP and class D amplifier seperate.
 
In my testing of the previous generation of the ESS DAC's they were very good but not quite up to the claimed numbers. I'm not cure how successfully you can compensate for analog distortion with digital tweaks. Pure sine waves would be the best target, audio seems unlikely.

We had similar experience, there is a lot more than just the DAC that figures into the final performance at these levels.
 
Member
Joined 2004
Paid Member
One of the new chapters in my second edition is a big one on switching power supplies in general, and for audio power amps in particular.

Of course, most pro amps of any significant power use SMPS already, be they class AB or class D amps. There are numerous different ways to implement SMPS supplies for audio power amps, including where to place the majority of the energy storage (reservoir) capacitance; on the input side of the main SMPS on the 385V intermediate bus, or on the dual-polarity main amplifier rails on the output side of the main SMPS. Similarly, there are different ways to deal with the issue of regulation.

Cheers,
Bob

I pushed TI's digital amp guys hard on a composite approach. two independent switching systems seems far less insightful than an integrated approach. Got nowhere. Since the system has knowledge of what is coming (by a few samples) and what has happened the supplies could be more efficiently using the power if the amp and the supply communicate.
 
getting a bit off topic, maybe Cordell book or amp thread for Power Amps?

Line Level amps with -140 dB or better distortion does seem to fit here

Having struggled through these things for years, I have to say that I have not seen any definitive strategies here to track down fortuitous cancellation, etc. effects. The problem of return of circulating currents in bypass loops could take one large chapter by itself.
 
The problem of return of circulating currents in bypass loops could take one large chapter by itself.

I have repeatedly suggested push-pull Class A for output op amps in a composite to turn PP rail currents very nearly linear and therefore their coupling effects largely (very small) gain errors

ClassApp.png