Low-distortion Audio-range Oscillator

AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
The 2nd may be a few dB optimistic due to the passive notch, but still 1st class performance I think.

Frex, if I would build this I would make it switchable for a couple of spot frequencies, make sure the level control is a good quality pot with a knob rather than a trimpot, and also include a balanced output connector, an XLR or better yet a combination XLR/TRS.
And of course power it with a SilentSwitcher ;-)

Any chance you will make an alternative packaging for some standard box with panel drawings for such a 'deluxe' version?

Jan
 
What I find amazing is that you can get this performance with opamps that are not exactly very low distortion.

Composite op-amps, Jim Williams and I exchanged a few mails on this and the original "distortionless" claim. B. Oliver described the problem in wonderful maths when the original HP oscillators sometimes failed to stabilize when the distortion was too LOW. The trade off is difficulty in trim as the distortion is reduced, indeed getting the parts per billion in AN67 would be difficult to hold.

EDIT - Dave and I crossed. I might add that few people realize that the light bulb oscillator has two mechanisms working and it's stability is due to the frequency independent voltage coefficient of resistance not the obvious thermal one. That's why a couple of years ago I showed the Christmas tree bulb oscillator which gets 20dB better than the common instrument bulb usually used.
 
Last edited:
Composite op-amps, Jim Williams and I exchanged a few mails on this and the original "distortionless" claim. B. Oliver described the problem in wonderful maths when the original HP oscillators sometimes failed to stabilize when the distortion was too LOW. The trade off is difficulty in trim as the distortion is reduced, indeed getting the parts per billion in AN67 would be difficult to hold.

EDIT - Dave and I crossed. I might add that few people realize that the light bulb oscillator has two mechanisms working and it's stability is due to the frequency independent voltage coefficient of resistance not the obvious thermal one. That's why a couple of years ago I showed the Christmas tree bulb oscillator which gets 20dB better than the common instrument bulb usually used.

Is this to say the higher voltage lamps have a lower voltage coefficient? I never looked so don't know.
 
Administrator
Joined 2004
Paid Member
Hi Frex,
I was very careful to build it following your BOM. Mostly Digikey parts. Needless to say, I was surprised to see 5 KHz. That's not a welcome frequency since I use an HP 339A, and switching a decade in frequency is easy. 5 KHz isn't.

They both work, but the 2nd harmonic is higher than it should be as Jan noted.

Jan, you could do that with a normal board. Just run the wires to your switching assy from the PCB, same for the level control.

-Chris
 
Hi Scott,
I have a number of #382 lamp type oscillators. Since they already exist, I'd love to play with them to see how good they could be made. What x-mas tree lamp did you use?

-Chris

Hi Chris.

If you go back a zillion posts ago you can read about my lamp multiplier. I don't know if you where involved with this thread that long ago.
It might be possible to use higher voltage lamps. The key is to keep the temperature of the filament down to avoid the sensitivity of a hot lamp.

It does require a descent R delta to work though
 
Last edited: