Three days ago, I modified AX11 using +-90VDC with cheap and easily to find transistors, almost like BX22. In simulation, I can achieved very high slew rate and low enough THD. I sent it to my social media friend (I never meet him before). He made PCB layout and test the prototype in almost 2 days only. He satisfied the result.
Actually, I made it for +-120VDC, but he made +-90VDC for class AB and will make +-120VDC for class H.
This topology is easy to scale up.
CCS in BX22 reduce voltage on CS transistor for about 30V (voltage drop on 10k)
Post the modified ver.here
No, I can not.
The main different is I use Hawksford cascode on VAS and compensation is same as I use on my AX11 modification that built by Ivanlukic.
Thank you, this is valuable info, because on both boards here in forum - in silk is 470R, people can check it for itself
Given the success of the FH9, I decided to take a totally fresh look at how to improve its performance and also to simplify its parts count. I think I have managed to do so, but it is so far removed from being an offshoot of one of Apex Audio's designs, I wonder if I should start a new thread or post here?
Basically it uses the venerable IRFP 240/9240 hexFET pair but in symmetric current feedback mode with a simple Vbe multiplier for temperature compensation. I have found that a simple resistor CCS is sufficient to achieve simulated THD of 0.00084% at 1kHz and 50v peak-peak on 53v rails. The simulated square wave performance is out of this world, clean and sharp up to 200kHz with no ringing. Oh, and did I mention that there are now only 7 active parts? Nothing exotic: BC546B/BC556B, KSA1381/KSC3503 VAS, BD139, and IRFP outputs...
Here is a teaser square wave closeup at 200kHz:
If we kept it in this thread, I would probably call it the CFH7.
Basically it uses the venerable IRFP 240/9240 hexFET pair but in symmetric current feedback mode with a simple Vbe multiplier for temperature compensation. I have found that a simple resistor CCS is sufficient to achieve simulated THD of 0.00084% at 1kHz and 50v peak-peak on 53v rails. The simulated square wave performance is out of this world, clean and sharp up to 200kHz with no ringing. Oh, and did I mention that there are now only 7 active parts? Nothing exotic: BC546B/BC556B, KSA1381/KSC3503 VAS, BD139, and IRFP outputs...
Here is a teaser square wave closeup at 200kHz:
If we kept it in this thread, I would probably call it the CFH7.
Attachments
Last edited:
Given the success of the FH9, I decided to take a totally fresh look at how to improve its performance and also to simplify its parts count. I think I have managed to do so, but it is so far removed from being an offshoot of one of Apex Audio's designs, I wonder if I should start a new thread or post here?
Basically it uses the venerable IRFP 240/9240 hexFET pair but in symmetric current feedback mode with a simple Vbe multiplier for temperature compensation. I have found that a simple resistor CCS is sufficient to achieve simulated THD of 0.00084% at 1kHz and 50v peak-peak on 53v rails. The simulated square wave performance is out of this world, clean and sharp up to 200kHz with no ringing. Oh, and did I mention that there are now only 7 active parts? Nothing exotic: BC546B/BC556B, KSA1381/KSC3503 VAS, BD139, and IRFP outputs...
Here is a teaser square wave closeup at 200kHz:
If we kept it in this thread, I would probably call it the CFH7.
Is this similar to FX8CF
Attachments
Hi Apex Audio:
A think it is a bit different as it has fewer stages. Ok, I will post here as there seems to be interest...
CFH7 - current feedback hexFET amp
Schematic:
1kHz sine wave:
50kHz square wave:
200kHz square wave:
FFT spectrum at 1kHz:
HD components at 1kHz:
HD components at 20kHz:
Attachments
Hi Apex Audio:
A think it is a bit different as it has fewer stages. Ok, I will post here as there seems to be interest...
CFH7 - current feedback hexFET amp
Schematic:
1kHz sine wave:
50kHz square wave:
200kHz square wave:
FFT spectrum at 1kHz:
HD components at 1kHz:
HD components at 20kHz:
it seems vssa
