John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
Hi Scott,

Thanks. Yes I knew it was a cascode, but I didn't know if it were possible for the FET to have a relatively high voltage developed across it. Just curious since I hadn't seen this circuit before.

If a tube was used that had a very low gm (a different tube type), would it be possible to have too much voltage appear across the mic assembly?

-Chris
Yes, I wouldn't use a 6AS7.
 
And of course not 6c33c-b :D ,
---------------------------------
BTW , I never experienced any electret capsule electrical fail incorporated in this simple design , but only few with mechanical fails , mostly caused from surrounding moisture .

Of course, you guys are goofing on improbables, but I've seen pictures of a real phono equalizer built with Eimac type 450TL final stage tubes. Maybe falls into the category of an art project (in Japan, where it's allowed). Sorry for using the forbidden "a" word in serious company.

All good fortune,
Chris
 
If memory serves, South America did not take part in the whole WW2 mess, so that leaves out a significant part of the Western hemisphere, reducing it geographically to just North America.

That's only if you work in percentages of territory engaged in WW2. If so, then only South America sat on the bench, and workig by continents, 5 of 6 were in it. Quite enough for a decent Wordl War, I think.
 
You need to bias the capsule which can be 50pF or so. Now consider the noise of a parallel RC and that the Brownian noise is around the 5nV level. You soon realize that the resistor must be VERY big.
Still having total mental block with this one..........

Say capsule bias is fed from a noise-free voltage source via a resistor. This resistor has unavoidable associated JN noise which increases with sqrt of its resistance. Then bigger resistor is more noisy, and 5G resistor itself generates about -60dBu of audioband noise........!?!:confused:
 
diyAudio Member RIP
Joined 2005
kT/C

For a parallel R-C at equilibrium, the rms voltage is independent of R, namely (kT/C)^(1/2). As bkdog says, the corner frequency gets lower with larger R and thus more of the noise is infrasonic.

The T dependence is real, but cooling is not of much help unless the microphone is bathed in dry gas to prevent condensation, and then only proportional to T^(1/2) :D

Preamp gate leakage is important. If it shows full shot noise, an equal contribution to resistor noise occurs with a leakage current of about 10.3pA for a 5G resistor at 300 K. This means choosing a JFET for low voltage noise alone may not be optimal (this is discussed by Scott W.). Since JFET leakage increases with temperature, roughly doubling for every 10 degrees K, cooling would help a lot were it not again for condensation (and power consumption).
 
Last edited:
Still having total mental block with this one..........

Say capsule bias is fed from a noise-free voltage source via a resistor. This resistor has unavoidable associated JN noise which increases with sqrt of its resistance. Then bigger resistor is more noisy, and 5G resistor itself generates about -60dBu of audioband noise........!?!:confused:

It also falls out of the classical KT/C noise derivation (R goes to infinity). I know you love this stuff. :)

http://www.coe.montana.edu/ee/andyo/ee503/ieee_abbott1996_thermalnoise.pdf

Or simply plot the noise spectral density of a parallel R and fixed C as R gets larger as others have said. The pole goes as R and the noise as sqrt(R).
 
Last edited:
If it shows full shot noise, an equal contribution to resistor noise occurs with a leakage current of about 10.3pA for a 5G resistor at 300 K.

Yes a good rule of thumb is when the current makes 2Vt on the R diminishing returns set in. Unfortunately the JFET datasheets don't help, the Ig spec is invariably sandbagged, for instance, SK170 typically measure only 2-3pA on an electrometer at low Vgd.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.