zobsky contemplates a variation on the belle klipsch

Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
Last edited:
I'm in the process of preparing a cut list for the major parts. I didn't component-ize my initial rendering (and therefor cannot easily explode the enclosure) so had to erase a few surfaces to view the internals.
Here's a shot of the rear.
 

Attachments

  • klipsch_belle_cutaway.png
    klipsch_belle_cutaway.png
    58 KB · Views: 544
On further introspection, it seems more efficient to add a center brace to the throat area (large unbraced area), rather than double up on the rear.

My personal rule of thumb is to leave no panel width of greater than 8-12" unbraced. I'm stretching the rule a bit but there should be enough scrap to add further bracing if needed. The important thing to note here is that this is a horn, so the orientation of the brace is as important as the position. Also, excessive bracing can affect the flow of sound waves through the horn
 

Attachments

  • klipsch_belle_cutaway.png
    klipsch_belle_cutaway.png
    71.5 KB · Views: 523
Plywood (3/4" baltic birch) has been been cut (about 2.5 sheets worth + some offcuts) . I had a local lumber yard ( Hardwood Lumber Company of Dallas ) make precision cuts for me this time so I don't have to hack at the ply for days in my cramped garage. I've attached the cut list I used to this post. Amazing what will fit in a compact hatchback. I'll soon post a (slightly) corrected sketchup rendering that matches up with the cutlist
 

Attachments

  • klipsch_belle_final.pdf
    33.7 KB · Views: 97
  • FullSizeRender (1).jpg
    FullSizeRender (1).jpg
    87.8 KB · Views: 429
Last edited:
I'm guessing that doubling up on the gaskets should work. any thoughts ?
With only 2.4 mm Xmax, an extra gasket (or 1/4" MDF) should provide plenty of clearance, but increases front chamber volume more than the surround recess I suggested that DJK showed.
Increasing the front chamber volume should slightly reduce the HP frequency.
 
Last edited:
With only 2.4 mm Xmax, an extra gasket (or 1/4" MDF) should provide plenty of clearance, but increases front chamber volume more than the surround recess I suggested that DJK showed.
Increasing the front chamber volume should slightly reduce the HP frequency.

I bought a 1/4" x 2" x 4" piece of MDF,.. mostly because it's cheaper , incompressible , easily available and more customizable than an off the shelf pair of gaskets . I can always add SOME of the internal offcut circle to the front chamber to reduce its volume . More info after i butcher the wood :)
 
Last edited:
just wondered if you have seen this thread might be of some interest.

https://community.klipsch.com/index.php?/topic/154589-port-location-for-belles-with-bass-reflex/


I just noticed that you have responded there. Others might find the thread of interest.

From his sketch, I like the way his reflex ports straddles the mid-treble horn. Yet another variation to ponder ....

In a week or so when I'm done with the bass bins (I'm taking this build slow and easy, for a change), I'll start tackling the mid-treble section. Do you have any suggestions for the top half? I'd like this to be a 2 way design. I'm not even sure how much a K501 costs but I don't care to pay any more than needed just for a klipsch badge. That said, I came across this post

http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full...-trynergy-full-range-tractrix-synergy-51.html

and found the horn cheaper at
Official Speaker Repair Site - Orange County Speaker - Home of GLS Audio PH2380 17.5" x 11" Horn
 
Status
This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.