John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.
Again, my best designs use better than FR-4. For example, the CTC Blowtorch uses Teflon, and the Vendetta Research uses Polyamide. However, all of the Parasound products use FR-4, remember, in respect to 'bang for the buck'.
Decades ago, being very sensitive to DA in caps, I found a similar potential problem in circuit boards, just like Tektronix did with FR-4. They called it 'circuit hook', and it was visually identifiable on an oscilloscope. Therefore, about 25 years ago we switched to Polyamide (we had to buy it special) with good success. It is important to address EVERY potential problem to get the very best results.

Funny how a lot of the designs I work on are often very sensitive analogue, analogue/digital rf all work perfectly on FR4, including boards for near space and spaceflight...again laminated have changed greatly in recent years, for numerous reasons the main instigators being the elevated temperatures required for lead free soldering and the ever increasing rise time of digital signals. There are also different types of FR4 with numerous weave patterns, glass content etc etc. No nee3d to use fancy laminates unless you really have to, there will be no difference signal wise, just increased material cost and more problematic board builds.
Of course it sound more "Audiophile" if you use a Teflon dielectric, one of the worse materials for building a board from, lamination is a pain as is registration for inner layers.....
 
Red. Bright red.

Green, easier to inspect and work with. Studies have shown that for numerous reasons green PCBs are much better for the production environment, reducing operator fatigue and improving throughput.
Our eyes are good at processing green, we can see more detail and the eyes do not tire as quickly.
Sound wise there are some who claim to hear differences!
 
Fas42, you found a wonderful book that I wish that I owned, but at over $300/copy, I'll pass. I did copy most of the first 50 pages that they showed. Fascinating! Just like I thought, but could not 'prove'!

Join the IPC there are hundreds of specs and instructions on this...
You could even look at things like the IPC-610 and class 3 assemblies...
Or I have both NASAs and ESA's guides to PCB design, manufacture and assembly (I believe they are available on the WEB) maybe these may be good enough for audio layouts!

The attached text file lists the basic IPC specifications relating to all aspects of PCB design, manufacture and assembly...they are used by ALL PCB manufacturers in the world and as a reference for most PCB design work, fabrication and assembly, so you don't have to re-invent the wheel or discover things that are all ready known, just follow the industries standards and guides.
 

Attachments

  • C-1000-contents.txt
    8.5 KB · Views: 42
Last edited:
Not much of an effect but it could be a bigger issue with high impedances.

Can you show any measurements showing this to be of significance to audio circuits (as opposed to the sort of ultra-high impedance measurement circuits that PTFE boards were created for)? The only exception I could think of would be at a condenser mike capsule, but that's usually air dielectric anyway.
 
Next they will be telling us 90 deg corners on PCBs are bad!!!

Just a thought, what TOLERANCE capacitors and resistors do you use for your analogue sections...just thinking cos I am laying out an analogue/digital board where ALL the resistors are 0.1% or better, they are using MLCCs as well in the sensitive analogue and this is on FR4.
Of course layout is very important, minimising feedback loop areas, short traces to high impedance inputs etc. etc. But....
 
AX tech editor
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Green, easier to inspect and work with. Studies have shown that for numerous reasons green PCBs are much better for the production environment, reducing operator fatigue and improving throughput.
Our eyes are good at processing green, we can see more detail and the eyes do not tire as quickly.
Sound wise there are some who claim to hear differences!

The other politically correct factor being of course that green boards are, ehh, green. :cool:
Save humanity with green PCBs!

Jan
 
A lot of research was done before being green meant something other than a bad pint and a dodgy curry:)

30 years ago (when I was but a lad) PCBs were not as good as they are now, with outgassing of PTH holes, warping etc. But that was years ago so there is no point referencing a lot of issues that have been ironed out, soldering has changed greatly and things move on. Oh and there are surface mount components as well.
Even Gerber's have been superseded by a much better format (and another one slowly gaining popularity).
 
Somewhat more readable and in pdf format.
I am sure you know how to stitch it back into one file.
Have to split due to size limit by the forum.


Patrick
 

Attachments

  • Motorola Zener Diode Theory 1.pdf
    739.8 KB · Views: 80
  • Motorola Zener Diode Theory 1a.pdf
    502.3 KB · Views: 59
  • Motorola Zener Diode Theory 2.pdf
    753.3 KB · Views: 66
  • Motorola Zener Diode Theory 3.pdf
    628.2 KB · Views: 53
  • Motorola Zener Diode Theory 4.pdf
    702.5 KB · Views: 52
  • Motorola Zener Diode Theory 5.pdf
    319.4 KB · Views: 60
Can you show any measurements showing this to be of significance to audio circuits (as opposed to the sort of ultra-high impedance measurement circuits that PTFE boards were created for)? The only exception I could think of would be at a condenser mike capsule, but that's usually air dielectric anyway.

Even mikes like the Rode are full SMD with >1G? chip resistors on FR4. They use a special overcoat for moisture incursion.

They use capsules with a bigish C, so it might be easier, remember also DA makes noise as I found out from mica.
 
Next they will be telling us 90 deg corners on PCBs are bad!!!

Just a thought, what TOLERANCE capacitors and resistors do you use for your analogue sections...just thinking cos I am laying out an analogue/digital board where ALL the resistors are 0.1% or better, they are using MLCCs as well in the sensitive analogue and this is on FR4.
.

I just ordered 8-.005% resistors for a work project, they billed me back >$900 ! There going onto an ordinary PCBexpress two layer board, I'm afraid it is unintentional overkill.
 
Last edited:
Next they will be telling us 90 deg corners on PCBs are bad!!!

....

Marce, my dear fellow, you are only 40 years too late with 90 degree angles.

Sometime in the mid-70ies, I read in a magazine (don't remember which, I read many at the time), a guy said exactly that, for sweet and natural sound, we should never, ever use 90 degree angles, but rather gentle slopes, presumably to prevent electrons from skidding off the right path to audiophile nirvana.

It takes all kinds. But appearently, some took this seriously. Just look at the artwork of Crown (Amcron) amps of the day, not a single 90 degree angle anywhere in sight, ditto for Sansui and probaby quite a few others.
 
Marce, my dear fellow, you are only 40 years too late with 90 degree angles.

Sometime in the mid-70ies, I read in a magazine (don't remember which, I read many at the time), a guy said exactly that, for sweet and natural sound, we should never, ever use 90 degree angles, but rather gentle slopes, presumably to prevent electrons from skidding off the right path to audiophile nirvana.

It takes all kinds. But appearently, some took this seriously. Just look at the artwork of Crown (Amcron) amps of the day, not a single 90 degree angle anywhere in sight, ditto for Sansui and probaby quite a few others.
See fashion does drive design. :eek::eek:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.